2022
DOI: 10.1007/s13347-022-00521-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Google Told Me So!” On the Bent Testimony of Search Engine Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding this, there is a significant body of scholarship that examines commercial search engines such as Google. Critical research has scrutinized the ideological underpinnings of search algorithms (Mager, 2014) and how people attempt to make themselves ‘algorithmically recognizable’ (Gillespie, 2017); unveiled the ‘bent testimony’ of search algorithms (Narayanan and De Cremer, 2022), which is commonly disguised by the seamless ubiquity of search engines in users’ daily lives (Haider and Sundin, 2019; Sundin et al, 2017); or provided a cultural retrospective of the process of Googlization and its information politics (Rogers, 2018; Vaidhyanathan, 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Scaffoldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notwithstanding this, there is a significant body of scholarship that examines commercial search engines such as Google. Critical research has scrutinized the ideological underpinnings of search algorithms (Mager, 2014) and how people attempt to make themselves ‘algorithmically recognizable’ (Gillespie, 2017); unveiled the ‘bent testimony’ of search algorithms (Narayanan and De Cremer, 2022), which is commonly disguised by the seamless ubiquity of search engines in users’ daily lives (Haider and Sundin, 2019; Sundin et al, 2017); or provided a cultural retrospective of the process of Googlization and its information politics (Rogers, 2018; Vaidhyanathan, 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Scaffoldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, they have an impact on the beliefs we hold about the matter at hand by means of the content they produce and make algorithmically recognizable (Gillespie, 2017: 65), in a sense generating a collaborative framework for ‘the validation of truth by public opinion’ (Oleinik, 2022: 186). ‘As such, googling resembles testimony because of our epistemic reliance on those who produce the content that gets presented to us when we perform a Google search’ (Narayanan and De Cremer, 2022: 3).…”
Section: Theoretical Scaffoldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Search results seem to be experienced as pieces of “knowledge” that you have uncovered through your knowledge-seeking activities. The fact that online search is actually, to a large extent, governed by algorithms and other sources of bias (Johnson, 2021; Narayanan & De Cremer, 2022) does not seem to matter much (or is too opaque) in one’s experience of this research activity. Indeed, Fisher et al (2015) showed that even if you explicitly and specifically direct people what to search for, the overconfidence effect of the act of searching holds.…”
Section: Charting the Conspiracist’s (Re)searchesmentioning
confidence: 99%