Goodwill or just for show? The effects of different corporate social justice statements and the role of perceived authenticity

Abstract

PurposeCompanies' voices on social justice issues, such as racial justice, gender equality and LGBTQ rights, have become increasingly prevalent. To contribute to current knowledge around corporate communication on social justice, this study aims to understand the differential effects of three types of corporate social justice statements – symbolic statements, substantive statements on external actions and substantive statements on internal actions.Design/methodology/approachA between-subjects experiment was conducted (N = 502), with different types of statements as the independent variable and corporate reputation and perceived corporate relationship-building efforts as outcomes. The three dimensions of perceived authenticity (i.e. perceived benevolence, transparency and commitment) were included as parallel mediators.FindingsThis study found that compared to symbolic statements, substantive statements on external or internal actions generated higher perceived authenticity on at least one of the three dimensions, which in turn, led to a more positive corporate reputation and perceived relationship-building efforts. Substantive statements on external actions and on internal actions also had differential indirect effects on the outcomes through different dimensions of perceived authenticity. Partisanship did not have a moderating effect on the mediating effects of perceived authenticity.Practical implicationsThis study highlights the importance of authenticity in corporate social justice communication and reveals practical implications about how businesses should communicate with publics when engaging in social justice issues.Originality/valueThis study is among the earliest efforts to examine the effects of different corporate social justice statements. It contributes to the existing literature by demonstrating the impacts of perceived authenticity on publics' evaluation of companies and opens up an avenue for future research to further examine various authenticity dimensions.

Responsibility, sustainability, or environmental justice? Strategic communication and evolving expectations for stewardship and citizenship

“…CSA approaches focus on contentious issues that are not related to a corporation’s core purpose or mission (Austin et al, 2019; Dodd and Supa, 2014; SY Lee and Chung, 2023; Rim et al, 2020). CSA also considers stakeholders’ perceived authenticity of and trust in a corporation’s actions, as well as the consequences of those perceptions (Pérez et al, 2020; Rim and Dong, 2018; Song and Dong, 2022; Xu and Chang, 2023). One example of this phenomenon is the way that Ben & Jerry’s have taken a stand on environmental justice issues, highlighting the social inequity in the disparate impacts of climate change (Martinez Gonzalez and Capizzo, 2023).…”