2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9469.2004.00403.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goodness of Fit via Non‐parametric Likelihood Ratios

Abstract: To test if a density "f" is equal to a specified "f" 0, one knows by the Neyman-Pearson lemma the form of the optimal test at a specified alternative "f" 1. Any non-parametric density estimation scheme allows an estimate of "f". This leads to estimated likelihood ratios. Properties are studied of tests which for the density estimation ingredient use log-linear expansions. Such expansions are either coupled with subset selectors like the Akaike information criterion and the Bayesian information criterion regime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applying Lemma 2 of Claeskens and Hjort (2004) yields N S p → 2L S as n → ∞, where N S and L S are given by (2) and (3) respectively. It follows that Pr(S = 1) → 1 under the selection rule (14) based on N s .…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Applying Lemma 2 of Claeskens and Hjort (2004) yields N S p → 2L S as n → ∞, where N S and L S are given by (2) and (3) respectively. It follows that Pr(S = 1) → 1 under the selection rule (14) based on N s .…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Kallenberg and Ledwina (1995) further established its consistency against essentially all fixed alternatives, allowing K n to increase with sample size at a proper rate. Claeskens and Hjort (2004) studied this test under local alternatives. The distribution of N s under the null hypothesis is given by the following Lemma.…”
Section: Smooth Test Of Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such test was first considered for goodness-of-fit testing by Ledwina (1994). Claeskens and Hjort (2004) discuss some alternative schemes based on both BIC and AIC that have better power properties. Such tests could be of interest to investigate in the missing data setting as well.…”
Section: Discussion and Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A natural idea is now to insert a nonparametric density estimate f for the unknown alternative position, leading to a genuine (and density-based) test statistic W n ( f ). Various tests worked with in Claeskens and Hjort (2004) are of this sort, and are shown there to have good theoretical and practical performance.…”
Section: Densities Cumulatives Topologiesmentioning
confidence: 94%