2020
DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2020.1791380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goodbyelabouring man, long livehomo economicus: the new precarity in the world of work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At least three different ways to use precarity exist in the literature (Millar, 2017): first, a labour condition related to flexible working conditions, the erosion of job stability and benefits; second, a socio-economic category or expression of class; third, based on Butler’s (2004, 2009) work as a frame of apprehension that conditions which lives are considered grievable. Drawing on work that seeks to bridge these differing approaches (Berlant, 2011; Butler and Stoyanova Russell, 2018; Mackenzie and McKinlay, 2021; Molé, 2010; Ozkiziltan, 2021; Tyler and Vachhani, 2021), we conceptualise precarity as a condition of certain labour market regimes, in particular neoliberalism, which has perpetuated inequalities in society (Amis et al, 2018; Stiglitz, 2013) through the roll back of regulations and promotion of free markets. Following such approaches, we are interested in how subjectivities are constituted through precarity.…”
Section: Precarious Neoliberal Spiritual and Gendered Subjectivities ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least three different ways to use precarity exist in the literature (Millar, 2017): first, a labour condition related to flexible working conditions, the erosion of job stability and benefits; second, a socio-economic category or expression of class; third, based on Butler’s (2004, 2009) work as a frame of apprehension that conditions which lives are considered grievable. Drawing on work that seeks to bridge these differing approaches (Berlant, 2011; Butler and Stoyanova Russell, 2018; Mackenzie and McKinlay, 2021; Molé, 2010; Ozkiziltan, 2021; Tyler and Vachhani, 2021), we conceptualise precarity as a condition of certain labour market regimes, in particular neoliberalism, which has perpetuated inequalities in society (Amis et al, 2018; Stiglitz, 2013) through the roll back of regulations and promotion of free markets. Following such approaches, we are interested in how subjectivities are constituted through precarity.…”
Section: Precarious Neoliberal Spiritual and Gendered Subjectivities ...mentioning
confidence: 99%