2002
DOI: 10.2307/3088345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Good Things Come in Threes: Single-Parent Multigenerational Family Structure and Adolescent Adjustment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
126
3
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
13
126
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Women living with a stepparent and single parents (with grandparent(s) or alone) had rates of sexual intercourse 34, 58, and 25 percent higher than women living in two-parent households. This is counter to existing research showing that children and adolescents in multigenerational households fare as well as those in two married parent households (Deleire and Kalil 2002; Kalil et al 2002). Although the measure of currently living with a parent and his/her cohabiting partner was not statistically significant at the .05 level, it was at the .10 level and had a similar relationship when compared to two biological parent family as well as step or single parents.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Women living with a stepparent and single parents (with grandparent(s) or alone) had rates of sexual intercourse 34, 58, and 25 percent higher than women living in two-parent households. This is counter to existing research showing that children and adolescents in multigenerational households fare as well as those in two married parent households (Deleire and Kalil 2002; Kalil et al 2002). Although the measure of currently living with a parent and his/her cohabiting partner was not statistically significant at the .05 level, it was at the .10 level and had a similar relationship when compared to two biological parent family as well as step or single parents.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Recent research on the prevalence and significance of cohabiting unions and multigenerational households implies the importance of considering these family types separately as well (Brown 2004; Cherlin and Fomby 2002; DeLeire and Kalil 2002; Kalil et al 2002; Loomis and Landale 1994; Manning and Lamb 2003). Cohabiting partners, like stepparents, may add time and resources, but they are also likely to have less social control authority than biological parents.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children from single-parent and stepparent families have higher poverty rates and lower levels of educational and occupational attainment than children who grow up with both their biological or adoptive parents (Astone & McLanahan, 1991; Biblarz & Raftery, 1993, 1999; DeLeire & Kalil, 2002; Kiernan, 1992; McLanahan & Sandefur, 1994; Wojtkiewicz, 1993). They report greater substance use and risk-taking behavior, such as smoking, drinking, and drug use (Carlson, 2006; DeLeire & Kalil, 2002; Hoffmann & Johnson, 1998).…”
Section: Family Structure Conflict and Child Well-beingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children from single-parent and stepparent families have higher poverty rates and lower levels of educational and occupational attainment than children who grow up with both their biological or adoptive parents (Astone & McLanahan, 1991; Biblarz & Raftery, 1993, 1999; DeLeire & Kalil, 2002; Kiernan, 1992; McLanahan & Sandefur, 1994; Wojtkiewicz, 1993). They report greater substance use and risk-taking behavior, such as smoking, drinking, and drug use (Carlson, 2006; DeLeire & Kalil, 2002; Hoffmann & Johnson, 1998). Further, these children are more likely to have sex at an early age (Davis & Friel, 2001; Thornton & Camburn, 1989), to be young and unmarried when they form their families (Cherlin, Kiernan, & Chase-Lansdale, 1995; Kiernan 1992; Kiernan & Hobcraft, 1997; McLanahan & Sandefur, 1994; Thornton 1991; Wu 1996), and to experience the dissolution of their own romantic unions (Amato & DeBoer, 2001; Kiernan & Cherlin, 1999; McLanahan & Bumpass, 1988; Wolfinger 1999).…”
Section: Family Structure Conflict and Child Well-beingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first such measure is living with an unmarried parent and grandparent. Past research (DeLeire and Kalil 2002) finds that teen children of single parents living in three-generation households have outcomes at least as good as do children of twoparent families. Our second measure of doubling-up is living with a parent and a potential nonmarital partner of that parent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%