2011
DOI: 10.2753/jec1086-4415150403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Good Soldiers on the Web: Understanding the Drivers of Participation in Online Communities of Consumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al 2014;Casaló et al 2010). This knowledge further catalyzed researchers' interest in determinants and implications of users' participation in respective online communities such as Epinions.com, Timezone.com, or VirtualTourist.com (e.g., Bateman et al 2010;Casaló et al 2010;Chen et al 2014;Mathwick et al 2008;Siering and Muntermann 2013;Wirtz et al 2013;Yen et al 2011), wherein researchers commonly differentiate between two types of users' participation behavior, active and passive participation: While active users contribute to the content and relationships within the network, for example by commenting posts, passive users preferably browse the content without actively contributing to the network via content generation or relationship building (Chen et al 2014). As Bateman et al (2010) point out, in the past, research mainly suggested two competing positions as explanation of different types of participation behaviors: Some authors support the position that users' participation in online communities is driven by motives of self-interest, while others demonstrate that altruistic motivations have a stake in participative behaviors.…”
Section: Research Theme: User Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al 2014;Casaló et al 2010). This knowledge further catalyzed researchers' interest in determinants and implications of users' participation in respective online communities such as Epinions.com, Timezone.com, or VirtualTourist.com (e.g., Bateman et al 2010;Casaló et al 2010;Chen et al 2014;Mathwick et al 2008;Siering and Muntermann 2013;Wirtz et al 2013;Yen et al 2011), wherein researchers commonly differentiate between two types of users' participation behavior, active and passive participation: While active users contribute to the content and relationships within the network, for example by commenting posts, passive users preferably browse the content without actively contributing to the network via content generation or relationship building (Chen et al 2014). As Bateman et al (2010) point out, in the past, research mainly suggested two competing positions as explanation of different types of participation behaviors: Some authors support the position that users' participation in online communities is driven by motives of self-interest, while others demonstrate that altruistic motivations have a stake in participative behaviors.…”
Section: Research Theme: User Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, if the content is functional (Lovett et al, 2013) and helps to solve users' problems it can spread quickly via WOM (Yen et al, 2011). This is because people enjoy helping others through sharing their knowledge in online platforms (Cheung and Lee, 2012;Hennig-Thurau et al, 2004).…”
Section: Informational Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These types of information increase the willingness of people to engage with the content and WOM advertising (Nusair et al, 2010). Consumers perceive the discount or promotional information of companies as a reward (Yen et al, 2011) and an opportunity for themselves (Gruen et al, 2006).…”
Section: Informational Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study conducted by Sicilia & Palazon (2008) explore that members contribute in an OBC based on functional, social and entertainment values. Yen, Hsu, and Huang (2011) suggested three categories of drivers for member's participation in an OBC which are self-enhancement (includes improvement in reputation and rank), rewards (includes instrumental values) and problem solving support (it includes assisting other members in customizing, using or trouble shooting).…”
Section: Drivers Of Online Brand Communities (Obc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When consumer join the OBC, he/she can gain or share communication among members about specific product or brand. The learning drivers refers to informational benefits which help consumer to gather and collect information about the product/brand and instrumental benefits consists on guiding and solving problems regarding product use (Nambisan & Baron, 2009;Yen et al, 2011). Social driver includes benefits that strengthen the member's participation through its knowledge about the product such as friendship, social enhancement and emotional support.…”
Section: Drivers Of Online Brand Communities (Obc)mentioning
confidence: 99%