2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-018-9789-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Good people do bad things: How anxiety promotes unethical behavior through intuitive and automatic processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…State anxiety leads individuals “to focus narrowly on their own basic needs and self-interest, which can cause them to be less mindful of principles that guide ethical and moral reasoning, thus leading them to behave unethically” (Kouchaki & Desai, 2015, p. 360; supported by five experiments). Similarly, Zhang, Shi, Zhou, Ma, and Tang (2020) theorized that “anxiety might increase unethical behavior because individuals who feel anxious are more likely to engage in intuitive automatic processing that shifts attention from moral standards to self-interest, and thus to behave unethically” (p. 720; supported by two experiments). Moreover, resisting unethical behaviors often requires self-control resources, which can be depleted by state anxiety (Fehr, Yam, He, Chiang, & Wei, 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Basis Of the Links Among Air Pollution State Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…State anxiety leads individuals “to focus narrowly on their own basic needs and self-interest, which can cause them to be less mindful of principles that guide ethical and moral reasoning, thus leading them to behave unethically” (Kouchaki & Desai, 2015, p. 360; supported by five experiments). Similarly, Zhang, Shi, Zhou, Ma, and Tang (2020) theorized that “anxiety might increase unethical behavior because individuals who feel anxious are more likely to engage in intuitive automatic processing that shifts attention from moral standards to self-interest, and thus to behave unethically” (p. 720; supported by two experiments). Moreover, resisting unethical behaviors often requires self-control resources, which can be depleted by state anxiety (Fehr, Yam, He, Chiang, & Wei, 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Basis Of the Links Among Air Pollution State Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in only reanalyzing the studies from their previous publication, Heck et al (2020) overlooked other studies directly testing the link between state anxiety and unethical behavior (e.g., five experiments from Kouchaki & Desai, 2015; two experiments from Zhang et al, 2020). Despite the many studies demonstrating the link between state anxiety and unethical behavior (see Fig.…”
Section: Assessment Of Heck Et Al’s Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu, Lee, Gino, and Galinsky (2018) theorized and found that air pollution positively predicted unethical behavior and that state anxiety was a mediating mechanism. Following Kouchaki and Desai (2015), they reasoned that the anxiety induced by air pollution can lead individuals “to focus narrowly on their own basic needs and self-interest, which can cause them to be less mindful of principles that guide ethical and moral reasoning, thus leading them to behave unethically” (p. 360; see also Zhang, Shi, Zhou, Ma, & Tang, 2020). The present research extends Lu et al’s (2018) work both theoretically and empirically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, research has demonstrated that emotional exhaustion can lead to increased incidence rates of depression and anxiety among police officers [ 14 ]. Other research, not on a police sample, showed a relationship between anxiety and increases in unethical behavior [ 15 ]. Thus, although not yet empirically validated, police executives should be concerned that officers who experience work-related anxiety may be more prone to engage in unethical behavior.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%