1996
DOI: 10.4171/rmi/198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Good metric spaces without good parameterizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
61
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Semmes [31] showed that the theorem of Bonk and Kleiner fails in dimension 3 for a geometrical realization of the decomposition space associated with the Bing double in R 3 , and for the manifold M mentioned earlier. Theorem 1.1 shows that these natural conditions for quasisymmetric parametrization are also insufficient in dimension 4 and higher.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semmes [31] showed that the theorem of Bonk and Kleiner fails in dimension 3 for a geometrical realization of the decomposition space associated with the Bing double in R 3 , and for the manifold M mentioned earlier. Theorem 1.1 shows that these natural conditions for quasisymmetric parametrization are also insufficient in dimension 4 and higher.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work by Semmes [Se1], [Se2] shows that the quasisymmetric characterization of R n or the standard sphere S n for n ≥ 3 is a problem that seems to be beyond reach at the moment. The intermediate case n = 2 is particularly interesting.…”
Section: The Quasisymmetric Uniformization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples by Semmes [49] show that the result of Bonk and Kleiner mentioned above does not generalize to dimension 3. Heinonen and Wu [33] and Pankka and Wu [45] gave further examples of geometrically nice spaces without QS parametrizations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%