2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00211-005-0674-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Good Lattice Rules in Weighted Korobov Spaces with General Weights

Abstract: We study the problem of multivariate integration and the construction of good lattice rules in weighted Korobov spaces with general weights. These spaces are not necessarily tensor products of spaces of univariate functions. Sufficient conditions for tractability and strong tractability of multivariate integration in such weighted function spaces are found. These conditions are also necessary if the weights are such that the reproducing kernel of the weighted Korobov space is pointwise non-negative. The existe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
179
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
179
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of the second part is similar to the proof of a result in [6] which makes use of Jensen's inequality, namely that for a sequence of positive numbers…”
Section: Further There Exists a Vector Z ∈ Z S Pm Such Thatmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The proof of the second part is similar to the proof of a result in [6] which makes use of Jensen's inequality, namely that for a sequence of positive numbers…”
Section: Further There Exists a Vector Z ∈ Z S Pm Such Thatmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the following we introduce the particular reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces in which numerical integration is frequently considered [3,5,6,9,13,14,16,17 [5] is given by…”
Section: Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Including the lower dimensional projections much reduces this effect. The weights γ u are then introduced to modify the importance of the discrepancy of the projections, with the intention to adjust the measure to the usage of the point set (see [6,29]). For example it has been observed that in many applications the higher dimensional projections are considerably less important than the lower dimensional ones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%