2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Good enough death: autonomy and choice in Australian palliative care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
145
0
10

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
145
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been criticism of attempts to establish what could be considered a good death due to the vast diversity of individual values and preferences and a growing consensus that a good death is something that cannot be defined beforehand in general terms and is not the same for everyone (Goldsteen et al, 2006, McNamara, 2004. We acknowledge the above (and many other) discussions on this concept and also the claim by Scarre (2012) that the expression "good death" is necessarily an oxymoron.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…There has been criticism of attempts to establish what could be considered a good death due to the vast diversity of individual values and preferences and a growing consensus that a good death is something that cannot be defined beforehand in general terms and is not the same for everyone (Goldsteen et al, 2006, McNamara, 2004. We acknowledge the above (and many other) discussions on this concept and also the claim by Scarre (2012) that the expression "good death" is necessarily an oxymoron.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…36 It thus reflects the core components of a particular professional ideology and commitment to the nature and achievement for all patients of a particular construct of 'the good death'. [37][38][39][40] This involves the excellent control of symptoms within a holistic approach to care, which acknowledges death as a natural, rather than a pathological, process. It incorporates a commitment to open awareness and communication about dying between all participants: patient, family and professionals.…”
Section: Talking About Death and Dying: Developing A Public Conversationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, our case studies show that negotiations about 'difference' in practices of 'doing death' are not a simple matter of clearly definable cultural or migrant backgrounds, but a matter of plurality and individual autonomy in contemporary societies (see also McNamara 2004). Drawing a clear line between diversities within and beyond societies -simply put, between non-migrants and migrants -is a complex thing, and lines of collision do not stick to clear-cut non-migrant or migrant specific reference systems, but become blurred and multifaceted in everyday practice.…”
Section: The Art Of Endurance In Challenged 'Death Work'mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Our analysis has shown that the normative notion of 'good death', inspired by hospice ideology (Hart et al 1998) and in practice adapted to a 'good enough death' within the institutional logics of professional palliative care (McNamara 2004), has also diffused into the nursing home, but in a very practical and intuitive manner. While nursing homes for several decades were oriented towards curative medical practice, they are now starting to shift their orientations towards ideals of palliative care (Kostrzewa and Gerhard 2010).…”
Section: 'Death Work'mentioning
confidence: 99%