2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2007.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Good clinical practice in orthokeratology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the concept that myopia OK lenses induce apical corneal epithelial thinning. 1,5,8,[15][16][17] After one night of OK lens wear, the maximum thinning magnitudes of central epithelium were 7% and 6% at the horizontal and vertical meridians, respectively. The magnitude reached 14% at the vertical meridian and 16% at the horizontal meridian after seven nights of wear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with the concept that myopia OK lenses induce apical corneal epithelial thinning. 1,5,8,[15][16][17] After one night of OK lens wear, the maximum thinning magnitudes of central epithelium were 7% and 6% at the horizontal and vertical meridians, respectively. The magnitude reached 14% at the vertical meridian and 16% at the horizontal meridian after seven nights of wear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] With the development of higher gas-permeable lens materials, overnight OK lens has come into greater use as a treatment modality to correct refractive error. [6][7][8] Previous studies have reported the time course of refractive and topographic thickness changes of the cornea and its sublayers in myopia OK lens wearers. [9][10][11] In an early study, Swarbrick et al, using a modified optical pachymeter, found central epithelial thinning and midperipheral corneal thickening after reverse-geometry lens wear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orthokeratology (OK) uses specially designed rigid contact lenses to reshape the cornea in order to temporarily reduce or eliminate refractive error [21,22]. Modern OK using sophisticated contact lenses with a reverse-geometry design can provide faster, larger, and more predictable refractive changes than OK lenses used in the original method introduced in the early 1960s [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Hiraoka et al 2008) Despite scientific conjecture on visual quality, patient satisfaction with OK treatment is high, (Hiraoka et al 2009 and they are demonstrated to be safe for children and adults to wear when appropriate fitting and patient education is undertaken. (Young et al 2004, Mika et al 2007, Cho et al 2008, Van Meter et al 2008, Walline et al 2009 …”
Section: Orthokeratologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All had myopia between 0.75 and 4.50D, with no more than 1.50D of with-the-rule astigmatism or 0.75D of against-the-rule astigmatism (Mountford 1997, Cho et al 2008 They achieved best-corrected acuity in soft contact lenses (SCL) of 6/6 in each eye before OK treatment, had no history of a previously treated BV disorder or vision training, no contraindications to contact lens wear including ocular surface disease, no ocular pathology, strabismus, amblyopia or other vision problems aside from refractive ametropia, and no previous rigid contact lens wear. The study was BIFR and BOFR were determined using the jump method with a prism bar in free space.…”
Section: Participants and Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%