Goniometric Reliability in a Clinical Setting

Abstract

Reliability of goniometric measurements has been examined only under standardized conditions and usually with healthy subjects. The purpose of this study was to assess goniometric reliability in a clinical setting. The reliability of goniometric measurements of passive elbow and knee positions was assessed using patients as subjects. The effect of using the means of repeated measurements and the interdevice reliability of three common goniometers were also examined. Results showed that intratester reliability for flexion and extension of the knee and the elbow joints was high (r = .91 to .99). Intertester reliability was also high (r = .88 to .97) for these measurements except for measurements of knee extension (r = .63 to .70). Although previous investigators have suggested that using the means of multiple measurements improves reliability, our data indicate that this procedure never improves the correlation coefficient more than .12. The reliability was similar for all three devices. The results of this study indicate that for the knee and elbow joints, goniometric measurements performed in a clinical setting can be highly reliable. The method described in this study provides a simple protocol that can be used clinically to investigate goniometric reliability.

The effects of the Bowen technique on hamstring flexibility over time: A randomised controlled trial

“…The results were tested for stability using an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (2,1) (Sim and Wright, 2000, p. 335) revealing that intra-tester equipment replacement was reliable (r Z 0.99). This result has also been confirmed by Rothstein et al (1983) and Gogia et al (1987) where r Z 0.91e0.99 during tests. The reliability of the active knee extension test has been confirmed by Gajdosik and Lusin (1983).…”

Effect of analgesic nerve block electrical stimulation in a patient with adhesive capsulitis

“…Intra-and interrater reliability of the goniometric measures was established in a pilot study to be 0.84. This was slightly lower than the results of Rothstein, Miller, and Roettger (1983), who reported an intrarater reliability of 0.91 to 0.99. Rotational lack was measured as described by Warmington (1970).…”

Concurrent validity and reliability of the Simple Goniometer iPhone app compared with the Universal Goniometer

“…There is high intra-rater reliability for UG measurement of knee extension and flexion (Pearson's r ≥ 0.91) (Gogia, Braatz, Rose, & Norton, 1987;Rothstein, Miller, & Roettger, 1983) and high inter-rater reliability for knee flexion (Pearson's r ≥ 0.82) (Rothstein, et al, 1983). Goniometry is also a sufficiently valid measurement tool when compared to measuring knee joint angle via radiography (Pearson's r ≥ 0.97, ICC 0.98-0.99) (Gogia, et al, 1987).…”