2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gone but not forgotten: The effects of cancelled intentions on the neural correlates of prospective memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

7
49
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(42 reference statements)
7
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present work, spontaneous retrieval was assessed following instructions that the prospective memory task was finished, and therefore we predicted that participants would deactivate their intentions or otherwise "turn off" the responsiveness of the spontaneous retrieval mechanism to no-longer-relevant prospective memory cues (Marsh, Hicks, & Bink 1998;Scullin et al, 2009;West, McNerney, & Travers 2007). Although the younger adults showed no intention interference in this context (consistent with our previous work; Scullin et al, 2009), the older adults continued to retrieve their prospective memory intentions, as evidenced by the significant slowing on target trials relative to control trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, spontaneous retrieval was assessed following instructions that the prospective memory task was finished, and therefore we predicted that participants would deactivate their intentions or otherwise "turn off" the responsiveness of the spontaneous retrieval mechanism to no-longer-relevant prospective memory cues (Marsh, Hicks, & Bink 1998;Scullin et al, 2009;West, McNerney, & Travers 2007). Although the younger adults showed no intention interference in this context (consistent with our previous work; Scullin et al, 2009), the older adults continued to retrieve their prospective memory intentions, as evidenced by the significant slowing on target trials relative to control trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, our study was based on the same logic as previous studies focusing on the prospective component of PM (Einstein et al, 2005;Knight et al, 2011;ScuUin et al, 2009ScuUin et al, , 2011West et al, 2007). Participants responded to specific PM cues and, after the PM task had been completed, canceled, or suspended, these PM cues were interleaved in an ongoing task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for the inconsistent findings obtained by West et al (2007) and Scullin et al (2009Scullin et al ( , 2011 might be manifold, as the studies also differ methodologically. However, the findings of PM cues not affecting performance after intention completion might be related to the strong context change between the PM task performance and the measurement of PM aftereffects in the Scullin et al paradigm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At this point, the target cue would no longer stimulate spontaneous retrieval of the prospective memory intention, consistent with the absence of intention interference in the finished condition (Experiment 2). West, McNerney, and Travers (2007) also investigated the fate of prospective memories following instructions to forget cues. In their study, participants received a different prospective memory cue before each block of a semantic judgment task and were instructed to either perform the prospective memory task or to forget about it for that block.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%