Behavior patterns combine with the physical environmental conditions to control the population density and distribution of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethica zibethica (Linn.). Many of these behavior patterns are seasonal or at least seasonal in the intensity with which they are manifest and seem to be correlated with and probably controlled by the seasonal physiological changes which occur in the animal.In this study we attempt to correlate the seasonal behavior patterns with the physiological cycles, and suggest how they may affect the composition and density of the population in the Wisconsin marshes. The investigation includes anatomical data from 237 muskrats, from every month of the year, and field observations on seasonal behavior patterns. The number of animals examined was limited by the difficulty of obtaining them. Most of the muskrats were captured alive, while a few were freshly skinned carcasses obtained from trappers. The live muskrats were obtained from the Horicon Marsh Wildlife Area in Dodge County, Wisconsin, and from the University of Wisconsin Arboretum, with the carcasses coming from nearby areas. This is a contribution from the Department of Wildlife Management and the Department of Zoology, University of Wisconsin. The study was made possible through the co-operation of the Pittman-Robertson Division of the Wisconsin Conservation Department, and was supported in part by a grant from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.Live muskrats were brought into the laboratory where they were killed within a few hours and the pituitary, testes, epididymides, prostate, preputial glands, ovaries, uteri, adrenals, and thyroids were removed and weighed immediately on a torsion balance. The coagulating glands were separated from the prostate since there seems to be some disagreement as to whether these lobes are morphologically and physiologically different (Walker, 1910a and 191Ob;Price, 1936). All organs, except the uteri, were weighed with their fluids and the combined weights of paired organs were recorded. The uteri were nicked with a razor blade and any fluids that were present were removed. The uteri from pregnant females were not used as it was nearly impossible to separate the maternal from the embryonic tissues. Smears were made from one epididymis to determine the presence or absence of sperm.The animals were divided into four classes: adult males, adult females, im-