2020
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12041012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gonadotroph Tumors Show Subtype Differences that Might Have Implications for Therapy

Abstract: Gonadotroph tumors, although frequent, are poorly studied and understood, being usually included in the larger nonfunctioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) group. Moreover, in comparison to the other types of PitNETs, no established medical treatment is currently available for gonadotroph tumors. Here, we performed a retrospective study and analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics of 98 gonadotroph tumors operated in a single large pituitary center. Although being larger in men (p = 0.01), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar correlation was also found between the percentage of FSH + cells and ERα + cells, suggesting the occurrence of tumour areas simultaneously rich and poor in FSH + , ERα + , and S100B + cells. Consistently, a positive correlation between FSH and ERα at the whole tumour level has already been reported in gonadotroph tumours [ 30 , 36 ], suggesting that our technical approach is appropriate to investigate spatial associations of marker co-expression. Given the fact that ERα is also expressed in the vast majority of normal human gonadotroph cells which produce, secrete and stain for FSH [ 37 , 38 ], we hypothesize that gonadotroph tumour cells expressing ERα and FSH might be closer to a normal phenotypic state than gonadotroph tumour cells lacking ERα and FSH expression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A similar correlation was also found between the percentage of FSH + cells and ERα + cells, suggesting the occurrence of tumour areas simultaneously rich and poor in FSH + , ERα + , and S100B + cells. Consistently, a positive correlation between FSH and ERα at the whole tumour level has already been reported in gonadotroph tumours [ 30 , 36 ], suggesting that our technical approach is appropriate to investigate spatial associations of marker co-expression. Given the fact that ERα is also expressed in the vast majority of normal human gonadotroph cells which produce, secrete and stain for FSH [ 37 , 38 ], we hypothesize that gonadotroph tumour cells expressing ERα and FSH might be closer to a normal phenotypic state than gonadotroph tumour cells lacking ERα and FSH expression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The identification of a heterogeneous spatial distribution of S100B + cells in individual gonadotroph tumours led us to question whether the spatial distribution of S100B + cells may be of functional relevance in these tumours. To address this question, we built a cartography based on the IHC analysis of multiple markers on serial tumour sections, including five new markers, namely Ki67 (a proliferation marker), FSH and LH (the two hormones produced by gonadotroph cells), SSTR2 (a potential marker of response to treatment), and ERα (a transcription factor and a potential marker of response to treatment) [ 26 , 30 ] (Fig. 5 A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scoring method of positive tumor cell percentage was as follows: zero points: no positive tumor cell, one point: percentage of positive tumor cells is <10%, two points: percentage of positive tumor cells is 10–50%, three points: percentage of positive tumor cells is 50–80%, and four points: percentage of positive tumor cells is >80%. Finally, the above two scores were multiplied to obtain the immunoreactive score (IRS) [ 14 ]. For VEGF, IRS greater or equal to 4 were considered to indicate high expression, whereas scores lower than 4 were considered to indicate low expression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After dehydration, transparency and mounting, the slides were visualized using a microscope. The immunostaining results of specific antibodies were measured semi-quantitatively by immunoreactive score (IRS) method [ 13 ]. The specific calculation method of IRS is as follows: Staining intensity (SI) classification: 0, no staining; 1, light yellow; 2, brown yellow, 3, dark brown; percentage of stained cells (PP): 0, no staining; 1, staining in < 10% of tumor cells; 2, staining in 10–50% of cells; 3, staining in 50–80% of cells; 4, staining in > 80% of cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%