2019
DOI: 10.1215/00031283-7251241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Golly, Gosh, and Oh My God! What North American Dialects can Tell Us about Swear Words

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second factor to consider is the written transmission. Given that lexical choices are known to shift from generation to generation (Tagliamonte & Brooke, 2014; Tagliamonte & Jankowski, 2019; Tagliamonte & Pabst, 2020), and the locus of linguistic change is generally acknowledged to be in spoken as opposed to written language (Milroy, 1992:32), the Old and Middle English extant manuscripts may leave the impression that this replacement was gradual even though the change may have been accelerated in spoken language but remained in the language in formal written contexts, as is attested in the extant manuscripts 18 . After all, there are well documented register effects that condition and constrain language variation and change (Biber, 2012), which may have contributed to the longevity of this lexical replacement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second factor to consider is the written transmission. Given that lexical choices are known to shift from generation to generation (Tagliamonte & Brooke, 2014; Tagliamonte & Jankowski, 2019; Tagliamonte & Pabst, 2020), and the locus of linguistic change is generally acknowledged to be in spoken as opposed to written language (Milroy, 1992:32), the Old and Middle English extant manuscripts may leave the impression that this replacement was gradual even though the change may have been accelerated in spoken language but remained in the language in formal written contexts, as is attested in the extant manuscripts 18 . After all, there are well documented register effects that condition and constrain language variation and change (Biber, 2012), which may have contributed to the longevity of this lexical replacement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although geography is often reported as the predominant explanatory factor for lexical variation, lexis is highly structured along the axes of social and stylistic variation. In recent work, several lexical sets have been explored, such as dinner versus tea (Jankowski & Tagliamonte, 2019), words of profanity (Tagliamonte & Jankowski, 2019), adjectives of strangeness (Tagliamonte & Brooke, 2014), and adjectives of positive evaluation (Stratton, 2022b; Tagliamonte & Pabst, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in Ontario, the change is moving comparatively slower, and outlying regions lag behind. This geographic pattern is consistent with other current changes in progress in the Canadian context (Franco & Tagliamonte, 2020;2021;Jankowski & Tagliamonte, 2019;Tagliamonte & Jankowski, 2018).…”
Section: Statistical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of this research has focused on determining how alignment or distancing from place as part of a speaker's identity is achieved through phonological variation, though some (e.g., Hazen 2002) have focused on morphosyntactic variation. In Ontario, Canada, a growing body of research is demonstrating variation in regional varieties of English (e.g., Tagliamonte 2014, Tagliamonte and Denis 2014, Tagliamonte and Jankowski 2018). Recently, Schlegl (2019) and Bigelow (2019) have suggested that speakers in Northern Ontario who align their identities with ideological aspects of Northernness (e.g., outdoorsiness, toughness, and rural masculinity) use specific linguistic variants (e.g., negative concord, or monophthongal /o/) to signal their Northern identity.…”
Section: Direction-givingmentioning
confidence: 99%