Goleman’s Leadership styles at different hierarchical levels in medical education

Abstract

Background: With current emphasis on leadership in medicine, this study explores Goleman's leadership styles of medical education leaders at different hierarchical levels and gain insight into factors that contribute to the appropriateness of practices. Methods: Forty two leaders (28 first-level with limited formal authority, eight middle-level with wider program responsibility and six senior-level with higher organizational authority) rank ordered their preferred Goleman's styles and provided comments. Eight additional senior leaders were interviewed in-depth. Differences in ranked styles within groups were determined by Friedman tests and Wilcoxon tests. Based upon style descriptions, confirmatory template analysis was used to identify Goleman's styles for each interviewed participant. Content analysis was used to identify themes that affected leadership styles. Results: There were differences in the repertoire and preferred styles at different leadership levels. As a group, first-level leaders preferred democratic, middle-level used coaching while the senior leaders did not have one preferred style and used multiple styles. Women and men preferred democratic and coaching styles respectively. The varied use of styles reflected leadership conceptualizations, leader accountabilities, contextual adaptations, the situation and its evolution, leaders' awareness of how they themselves were situated, and personal preferences and discomfort with styles. The not uncommon use of pace-setting and commanding styles by senior leaders, who were interviewed, was linked to working with physicians and delivering quickly on outcomes. Conclusions: Leaders at different levels in medical education draw from a repertoire of styles. Leadership development should incorporate learning of different leadership styles, especially at first-and mid-level positions.

The leadership behaviors needed to implement clinical genomics at scale: a qualitative study

“…Senior leadership, as outlined above, derives power from the position held in the organization, or through the medical hierarchy an assumption of an expert role. 6,7 By contrast, clinical leadership calls for health-care professionals to draw on their clinical experience and knowledge to provide leadership focused on patient care. Edmonstone 18 notes clinical leaders tend to (1) use persuasion, rather than hierarchical power; (2) prefer evidence-based and planned change in consultation with colleagues; and (3) use reflective practice rather than a technical-rational approach.…”

“…Despite being outdated, the traditional leadership model in medicine is hierarchical 6 with those in senior roles utilizing "top down" approaches of leadership arising from their positional power and perceived expertise. 7 Genomic medicine usurps this convention by providing opportunities for early career medical practitioners to lead different areas of clinical genomics delivery (e.g., in clinical genetics, nephrology, neurology, immunology). This raises interesting parallels with digital technologies: just as we talk about digital natives (i.e., those born in the digital era) and migrants (i.e., those who came to digital technologies later in their life) 8 clinical genomics too has natives and migrants.…”

How to Incorporate a Chief Fellow Into a Gastroenterology Fellowship Program

“…It is imperative that the person considering the chief fellow role is passionate about the mission of the role. The chief fellow would benefit from some faculty development on different leadership styles (eg, visionary, coaching, affiliative, democratic, pacesetting, commanding), 6 how to approach conflict resolution, and other common leadership situations. A successful chief fellow should aim to adapt to different leadership styles based on the unique situation.…”

An observational study of self-monitoring in ad hoc health care teams

“…For example, Tiel and colleagues demonstrated that patient mortality is lower when trauma teams are trained in teamwork, including leadership skills [10]. One such key skill is coordination [11] or, as Marks et al put it, "orchestrating the sequence and the timing of interdependent actions" [12]. Teamwork in emergencies furthermore should be contextually adaptive and account for team member experience and patient acuity [13].…”