2013
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph10094186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gold Standard Program for Heavy Smokers in a Real-Life Setting

Abstract: Background: High-intensity smoking cessation programs generally lead to more continuous abstinence, however, lower rates of success have been reported among heavy smokers. The aim was to evaluate continuous abstinence among heavy smokers during the intensive 6-week Gold Standard Program (GSP) and to identify modifiable factors associated with continuous abstinence. Methods: In this nationwide clinical study based on 36,550 smokers attending an intensive cessation program in Denmark. Heavy smoking was defined a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(98 reference statements)
1
42
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Number of pack‐years was calculated as (number of cigarettes per day/20) × number of years smoked. A cutoff value of 20 pack‐years has been used in previous studies to define heavy smoking . Former smokers (n = 42) were excluded from analyses because of unclear reporting of former smoking status.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Number of pack‐years was calculated as (number of cigarettes per day/20) × number of years smoked. A cutoff value of 20 pack‐years has been used in previous studies to define heavy smoking . Former smokers (n = 42) were excluded from analyses because of unclear reporting of former smoking status.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Although such therapies are not available on a nationwide basis, they are seen as an important option in becoming smoke free particularly for this group of smokers. 10 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…ISCI, such as GSP, has an effect across socioeconomic and vulnerable groups, including smokers diagnosed with SMD. Previous studies on GSP have found similar results in disadvantaged 94 , heavy 95 , pregnant 159 , elderly 160 and, most recently, young 161 groups of smokers, and the programme has also proven to be effective in randomised and controlled trials 127,162 .…”
Section: Vulnerable and Disadvantaged Groupsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In contrast, the difference in proportions between those who wants to quit in the two groups is only 6% 84 (table 2). Research of real-life data shows nearly the same effect for disadvantaged groups and heavy smokers as for the background population: 26-29% versus 33% remain smoke-free six months after a GSP 94,95 . It is appropriate to examine whether this result also applies to patients with SMD or whether there is a need to develop new programmes for this important subgroup of smokers.…”
Section: Smoking Cessation Intervention For Vulnerable Groups -Exemplmentioning
confidence: 87%