2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gold nanoparticle decorated electrospun nanofibers: A 3D reproducible and sensitive SERS substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to steric hindrance and the deposition process, the surface coverage obtainable by this technique is limited and in very few cases can reach 50% of the substrate area reducing a priori the achievable hotspots surface density, although the use of sacrificial organic shells can lead to the preparation of homogeneous hotspot distributions [18]. This method is not restricted to flat substrates, and the use of rough or fibrous substrates offers additional capabilities [19,20]. Without having to resort to changes in the particle properties, additional control parameters can be made available by organizing the nanoparticles at the liquid/air interface prior to their transfer to a solid support using the LB technique [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to steric hindrance and the deposition process, the surface coverage obtainable by this technique is limited and in very few cases can reach 50% of the substrate area reducing a priori the achievable hotspots surface density, although the use of sacrificial organic shells can lead to the preparation of homogeneous hotspot distributions [18]. This method is not restricted to flat substrates, and the use of rough or fibrous substrates offers additional capabilities [19,20]. Without having to resort to changes in the particle properties, additional control parameters can be made available by organizing the nanoparticles at the liquid/air interface prior to their transfer to a solid support using the LB technique [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different polymers or ceramic nanofibers, such as PVA [ 100 , 116 , 117 ], cellulose [ 118 ], poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) [ 119 ], chitosan [ 106 ], poly (acrylic acid) (PAA)/PVA [ 120 ], and silica [ 121 ] have been utilized to combine with different Ag or Au nanostructures to fabricate the flexible substrate for SERS. PVA is a nontoxic, biocompatible polymer, which has good electrospinability, and it is a popular material for electrospinning.…”
Section: Sensing Applications Of Electrospun Polymer Nanofibers Decormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite this huge potential of SERS in (bio)analytics, the technique is not accepted in routine analytics, which is often associated with the lack of reproducibility of the applied SERS substrates. To address this obstacle, a number of fabrication strategies are available claiming the preparation of ‘reproducible SERS substrate’ [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Additionally, SERS is combined with microfluidic approaches in order to allow for comparable and reproducible measuring conditions in quantitative detection schemes [ 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%