2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.104624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gold mobilization during prograde metamorphism of clastic sedimentary rocks: An example from the Liaohe Group in the Jiao–Liao–Ji Belt, North China Craton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 96 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the Co/Ni ratios of Py‐oc and Py‐r range between 0.02–0.17 and 0.01–0.74, respectively, with only one spot 1.40, which argues against the hypothesis of a single magmatic‐hydrothermal origin of the metal‐bearing fluids, and instead supports metamorphic and/or epizonogenic (Chen et al, 2009) hydrothermal origin sourced from wall rocks, such as the Gaixian Formation. As the Gaixian Formation constitutes the most significant wall rock unit in this region (Cui et al, 2022; Feng et al, 2019; Yu et al, 2018; Zeng et al, 2019), it seems most plausible that the metals were scavenged from these wall rocks and then incorporated into the pyrite structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the Co/Ni ratios of Py‐oc and Py‐r range between 0.02–0.17 and 0.01–0.74, respectively, with only one spot 1.40, which argues against the hypothesis of a single magmatic‐hydrothermal origin of the metal‐bearing fluids, and instead supports metamorphic and/or epizonogenic (Chen et al, 2009) hydrothermal origin sourced from wall rocks, such as the Gaixian Formation. As the Gaixian Formation constitutes the most significant wall rock unit in this region (Cui et al, 2022; Feng et al, 2019; Yu et al, 2018; Zeng et al, 2019), it seems most plausible that the metals were scavenged from these wall rocks and then incorporated into the pyrite structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%