2019
DOI: 10.5117/2019.032.003.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

'Going implicit': Using implicit measures in organizationsWe thank Catherine Apers for recommending literature on projective tests and for valuable suggestions on earlier drafts of this paper.

Abstract: Impliciete tests winnen aan populariteit binnen de arbeids- en organisatiepsychologie. Ondanks deze groeiende populariteit is nog relatief weinig bekend over de verschillende soorten impliciete tests, de constructen die ermee gemeten worden en de mate waarin ze relevant gedrag in organisaties voorspellen. In dit artikel bespreken we eerst wat impliciete processen zijn op basis van de duale procestheorie. Vervolgens bespreken we de drie meest populaire impliciete tests, namelijk de Implicit Association Test (im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, an IAT that was developed to predict training skills and that could be used to hire or promote individuals was perceived by participants to lack procedural justice due to low job-relatedness and too little opportunity to perform (i.e., applicants' feeling that the selection procedure allows them to show their abilities) as judged by the participants (Wright & Meade, 2011). For TAT-like instruments, concerns have been raised about their lack of face validity (Van Rensburg et al, 2019), which could lead to defensive test-takers responses (Ridgeway, 2017). To our knowledge, applicant reactions to CRTs have not been empirically investigated so far (Connelly et al, 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, an IAT that was developed to predict training skills and that could be used to hire or promote individuals was perceived by participants to lack procedural justice due to low job-relatedness and too little opportunity to perform (i.e., applicants' feeling that the selection procedure allows them to show their abilities) as judged by the participants (Wright & Meade, 2011). For TAT-like instruments, concerns have been raised about their lack of face validity (Van Rensburg et al, 2019), which could lead to defensive test-takers responses (Ridgeway, 2017). To our knowledge, applicant reactions to CRTs have not been empirically investigated so far (Connelly et al, 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%