Going GAGAS for due process: examining Yellow Book standard participation

Abstract

PurposeThe US federal government requires auditors to follow governmental auditing standards when performing audits of entities expending significant federal government dollars. This study explores stakeholder participation during the comment letter phase of government auditing standard setting to determine if participation is symbolic or substantive.Design/methodology/approachResearchers conduct an analysis of the 179 comment letters submitted to the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) and received for their 2010 and 2017 exposure drafts of government auditing standards.FindingsThe distribution of stakeholder participation groups in the government auditing standard-setting process differs from the distribution in the private company auditing standard-setting process. On average, participants submit letters that are greater than two pages in length. Participants also contribute feedback on topics that the GAO directly solicits. Taken together, the results demonstrate stakeholder behaviors that are consistent with a substantive rather than symbolic due process involvement for government auditing standards.Research limitations/implicationsStakeholder beliefs are inferred based on the observed behavior of comment letter submissions. Also, there is a subjective element to the classification of the comment letters for the study.Practical ImplicationsGiven the far-reaching implications of Yellow Book auditing standards on public, private and nonprofit entities, the findings are relevant to a heterogeneous audience. This study reveals opportunities for users of government auditing standards, practitioners and academics for greater involvement in due process standard setting to bring additional legitimacy to the GAO and its standard-setting activities.Originality/valueBeyond the current study, little empirical research examines Yellow Book auditing standards or the due process through which these standards are established. This is the first study to examine the complete set of comment letters for the 2010 and 2017 exposure drafts of government auditing standards.

Leave it in! Analyzing the responses to a proposal to remove governmental accounting from the certified public accountant examination

“…With respect to lobbying behavior of the public sector, only a limited number of studies examine the lobbying behavior of state/local governments and not-for-profit (NFP) organizations in the accounting and auditing standard-setting process. Specifically, these studies analyze the behavior of state governments around public pension accounting standards (GASB 67 and 68) (Allen and Petacchi, 2014), updates to financial reporting by NFP entities (Deis and Shroff, 2020), or Yellow Book auditing standards (Flasher et al, 2020). Limited research in this area is also noted outside of the US -in Canada (Richardson, 2008) or Australia (Ryan, Dunstan, and Stanley, 1999).…”