2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2203.16706
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Going Beyond RF: How AI-enabled Multimodal Beamforming will Shape the NextG Standard

Abstract: Incorporating artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) methods within the 5G wireless standard promises autonomous network behavior and ultra-low-latency reconfiguration. However, the effort so far has purely focused on learning from radio frequency (RF) signals. Future standards and next-generation (nextG) networks beyond 5G will have two significant evolutions over the state-of-the-art 5G implementations: (i) massive number of antenna elements, scaling up to hundreds-tothousands in number, and (i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
(170 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike traditional CSI-based methods, optical sensor-aided beamforming methods do not require CSI measurements, and they can also simultaneously decide the best beams for both transmitter and receiving devices. In addition, the accuracy of those methods can be improved by adding GPS information or fusing it with optical and CSI data [208].…”
Section: Computer Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike traditional CSI-based methods, optical sensor-aided beamforming methods do not require CSI measurements, and they can also simultaneously decide the best beams for both transmitter and receiving devices. In addition, the accuracy of those methods can be improved by adding GPS information or fusing it with optical and CSI data [208].…”
Section: Computer Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike traditional CSI-based methods, optical sensor-aided beamforming methods do not require CSI measurements, and they can also simultaneously decide the best beams for both transmitter and receiving devices. In addition, the accuracy of those methods can be improved by adding GPS information or fusing it with optical and CSI data [207].…”
Section: Computer Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While exhaustive searching through all candidate options ensures the beam alignment, the typical time to complete the entire procedure is in the order of ⇠10 ms for IEEE 802.11ad [8] and ⇠5 ms for 5G-NR [23] with only 30 beam pairs, respectively. To address this, we propose a beam selection framework that uses out-of-band multimodal data to identify a subset of candidate beams, which are subsequently swept to select the one that maximizes the normalized signal power [42].…”
Section: Subset Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%