Goffman, totalisation, and resistance in South Korean coaching: understanding the “underlife” of coaching

Abstract

Despite the growing body of research that has examined the complex relations in football organisations, one context that has received considerably less attention is the state-led elite sport systems in South Korea. In this article, we examine the interplay between self, affiliation and disaffection within the coaching regime at Suwon University FC (pseudonym), a prestigious school athletic team in South Korea. The precise research methods combined semi-structured interviews and auto-photography. The findings revealed how athletes struggled with the dialectical tension between identification with the coaching context, while also displaying resistant acts that distanced themselves from the organisational practices. Informed by Goffman's concepts of primary and secondary adjustments, the discussion illuminates how athletes exercised their limited agency for self-preservation, despite aligning to the 'totalising' regime. Such work contributes to better understanding the 'underlife' of coaching practice and, more broadly, illustrates the functional complexity between disciplinary structures and agency within coaching practice.

Youth athlete learning and the dynamics of social performance in Norwegian elite handball

“…A Foucauldian analysis of athlete development practices in Norway is beyond the scope of this paper, but this complementary perspective sensitises us to how individuals manage their identities as talented athletes, and the behavioural performance management strategies they exhibit. Contextual awareness is important because, as several previous studies have shown, athlete development and self-awareness are shaped within organisational settings such as collegiate sports, professional football academies and state-led sports systems (see, for example Hatteberg, 2018; Lee and Corsby, 2021; Parker and Manley, 2017).…”

Birthing A Secret Creative Self in Suppressive Organizations

“…It is hard to imagine how one can escape this totalizing process of performative regulation (Dodge 2015; Lee and Corsby 2021). Yet, both Goffman and Foucault are intrigued by the instances and spaces where individuals can construct a sense of self beyond the espoused regime.…”

“…For Goffman, the “underlife” denotes the range of activities that people develop to distance themselves from the surrounding institution (Jørgensen 2022). Withdrawal, intransigence, and cynicism are subtle acts of self‐preservation (Lee and Corsby 2021; Scott 2010). The backstage is where “the performer can reliably expect that no member of the audience will intrude, thus allowing performers to behave out of character while there” (Goffman 1956:69).…”

Beyond coping and adaptation: Toward a sociology of coaching. A necessary paradigm shift to address contemporary dramatic social change

“…The field has long been developed with very limited sociological input and there is a lack of research on how it relates to societal issues such as macroeconomic development, power dynamics and democratic governance, social stratification and inequality, social mobility, corruption, crime, and so on. Although in sports coaching many have noticed that sociology is ‘the invisible ingredient in coaches’ knowledge’ (Potrac and Jones, 2019 [1999]: 55–59; emphasis added) and suggested a wider range of sociological concepts to better inform the practice (Cushion, 2018; Jones et al, 2011; Lee and Corsby, 2021), non-sports coaching has largely evolved either with no consistent theoretical foundation or under the guidance of coaching psychology. In the aftermath of the Great Recession of 2007–2009 (Duignan, 2023), a growing body of critical literature (Chiu, 2022; Gannon, 2021; Shoukry and Cox, 2018) has emphasized the need to analyze coaching as a social process and ‘an enabler for [desired social] change’ (Shoukry, 2017).…”