2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11153-018-9695-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

God’s omnipresence in the world: on possible meanings of ‘en’ in panentheism

Abstract: Panenetheism is the claim that God and the cosmos are intimately interrelated , with the cosmos being in God and God being in the cosmos. What does this exactly mean? The aim of this paper is to address this question by sheding light on four possible models of God-world-inter-relatedness. Being critical of those models, which understand maximal immanence in a literal, spatial sense, the paper argues in favor of a model, which cashes out immanence in terms of divine activity. God is, where God acts. Since God a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I begin with an affirmation of panentheism, which as Gasser puts it, provides “a passage between the Scylla of a strict ontological divide between God and cosmos on the one hand, and the Charybdis of God and cosmos collapsing into one. Finding such a passage depends on how to spell out the ‘en’ in panentheism” (2019, 44). After exploring several models for explaining in what sense God is present in the world, Gasser favors a view of immanence “in terms of divine activity: God is there, where God acts.…”
Section: Panentheism Not Pantheismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I begin with an affirmation of panentheism, which as Gasser puts it, provides “a passage between the Scylla of a strict ontological divide between God and cosmos on the one hand, and the Charybdis of God and cosmos collapsing into one. Finding such a passage depends on how to spell out the ‘en’ in panentheism” (2019, 44). After exploring several models for explaining in what sense God is present in the world, Gasser favors a view of immanence “in terms of divine activity: God is there, where God acts.…”
Section: Panentheism Not Pantheismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panentheistic vision should be a »golden mean« between traditional theism, which stresses the plurality of accidental beings and divine transcendence, and pantheism, which emphasizes, like Spinoza, monism and the immanence of God in the world. So, it is not pantheism, where God is identical with the nature (Deus sive natura), but that the world is like a body of God or a sponge, soaked in God (Gasser 2018).…”
Section: Contemporary Philosophical Contexts: Panentheism and Post-thmentioning
confidence: 99%