“…proving the first inequality in (54); the second inequality follows from ( 51) and the boundedness Assumption 3.…”
Section: Proposition 4 (Robustness Of the Adjoint Residual Representativementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Proof. (60) is a direct consequence of the identity (55) and the bound for the adjoint problem (54). Finally, Equations ( 61) and ( 62) are consequence of the triangular inequality…”
Section: Assumption 7 (Adjoint Saturation Condition) Let U Dgmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Following [54], we consider the following saddle-point problem as the adjoint formulation of problem (37):…”
“…This assumption ensures the existence of a localizable a posteriori error estimate in line with (54). When considering direct solvers, the third problem's solution cost is the same for both estimators, as they require to invert a matrix of the same size.…”
“…Our GoA strategy is similar to a recent DPG theory [54], where they solve the adjoint problem in terms of the original saddle-point formulation with a different right-hand side. For advection-diffusion-reaction, several works explore the use of conforming FEM stabilization schemes (see [20,21,46,47,55]).…”
We propose a goal-oriented mesh-adaptive algorithm for a finite element method stabilized via residual minimization on dual discontinuous-Galerkin norms. By solving a saddle-point problem, this residual minimization delivers a stable continuous approximation to the solution on each mesh instance and a residual projection onto a broken polynomial space, which is a robust error estimator to minimize the discrete energy norm via automatic mesh refinement. In this work, we propose and analyze a goal-oriented adaptive algorithm for this stable residual minimization. We solve the primal and adjoint problems considering the same saddle-point formulation and different right-hand sides. By solving a third stable problem, we obtain two efficient error estimates to guide goaloriented adaptivity. We illustrate the performance of this goal-oriented adaptive strategy on advection-diffusionreaction problems.
“…proving the first inequality in (54); the second inequality follows from ( 51) and the boundedness Assumption 3.…”
Section: Proposition 4 (Robustness Of the Adjoint Residual Representativementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Proof. (60) is a direct consequence of the identity (55) and the bound for the adjoint problem (54). Finally, Equations ( 61) and ( 62) are consequence of the triangular inequality…”
Section: Assumption 7 (Adjoint Saturation Condition) Let U Dgmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Following [54], we consider the following saddle-point problem as the adjoint formulation of problem (37):…”
“…This assumption ensures the existence of a localizable a posteriori error estimate in line with (54). When considering direct solvers, the third problem's solution cost is the same for both estimators, as they require to invert a matrix of the same size.…”
“…Our GoA strategy is similar to a recent DPG theory [54], where they solve the adjoint problem in terms of the original saddle-point formulation with a different right-hand side. For advection-diffusion-reaction, several works explore the use of conforming FEM stabilization schemes (see [20,21,46,47,55]).…”
We propose a goal-oriented mesh-adaptive algorithm for a finite element method stabilized via residual minimization on dual discontinuous-Galerkin norms. By solving a saddle-point problem, this residual minimization delivers a stable continuous approximation to the solution on each mesh instance and a residual projection onto a broken polynomial space, which is a robust error estimator to minimize the discrete energy norm via automatic mesh refinement. In this work, we propose and analyze a goal-oriented adaptive algorithm for this stable residual minimization. We solve the primal and adjoint problems considering the same saddle-point formulation and different right-hand sides. By solving a third stable problem, we obtain two efficient error estimates to guide goaloriented adaptivity. We illustrate the performance of this goal-oriented adaptive strategy on advection-diffusionreaction problems.
A b s t r ac t . This article introduces the DPG-star (from now on, denoted DPG*) finite element method. It is a method that is in some sense dual to the discontinuous Petrov-Galerkin (DPG) method. The DPG methodology can be viewed as a means to solve an overdetermined discretization of a boundary value problem. In the same vein, the DPG* methodology is a means to solve an underdetermined discretization. These two viewpoints are developed by embedding the same operator equation into two different saddle-point problems. The analyses of the two problems have many common elements. Comparison to other methods in the literature round out the newly garnered perspective. Notably, DPG* and DPG methods can be seen as generalizations of LL * and least-squares methods, respectively. A priori error analysis and a posteriori error control for the DPG* method are considered in detail. Reports of several numerical experiments are provided which demonstrate the essential features of the new method. A notable difference between the results from the DPG* and DPG analyses is that the convergence rates of the former are limited by the regularity of an extraneous Lagrange multiplier variable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.