2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goal orientation and reading comprehension strategy use among students with and without reading difficulties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
19

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
28
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, researchers seem to agree that a mastery goal is related to "an adaptive pattern of attributions and positive affect that will help a student try hard, persisting, and ultimately doing better on academic tasks" (Pintrich & Schunk, 1996, p. 239). For instance, it has been documented that mastery oriented students process the learning information at a deep level (Ames & Archer, 1988;Pintrich, 2000b), that they are more cognitively engaged in a task (Pintrich & Schrauben, 1992), use more metacognitive and self-regulating strategies (Meece, Blumenfeld, & Hoyle, 1988), enjoy their learning more (Elliot & Church, 1997) and tend to obtain better academic grades (e.g., Botsas & Padeliadu, 2003;Vansteenkiste, Simons, Lens, Soenens, Matos, & Lacante, 2004, Zusho & Pintrich, 2003. It must be noted though that some researchers have failed to replicate the latter finding (e.g., Harackiewicz, Barron, & Elliot, 1998) and instead showed that performance approach goals were most predictive of academic achievement.…”
Section: Mastery and Performance Achievement Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, researchers seem to agree that a mastery goal is related to "an adaptive pattern of attributions and positive affect that will help a student try hard, persisting, and ultimately doing better on academic tasks" (Pintrich & Schunk, 1996, p. 239). For instance, it has been documented that mastery oriented students process the learning information at a deep level (Ames & Archer, 1988;Pintrich, 2000b), that they are more cognitively engaged in a task (Pintrich & Schrauben, 1992), use more metacognitive and self-regulating strategies (Meece, Blumenfeld, & Hoyle, 1988), enjoy their learning more (Elliot & Church, 1997) and tend to obtain better academic grades (e.g., Botsas & Padeliadu, 2003;Vansteenkiste, Simons, Lens, Soenens, Matos, & Lacante, 2004, Zusho & Pintrich, 2003. It must be noted though that some researchers have failed to replicate the latter finding (e.g., Harackiewicz, Barron, & Elliot, 1998) and instead showed that performance approach goals were most predictive of academic achievement.…”
Section: Mastery and Performance Achievement Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nolen ( , en Nicholls, 1992 encontró que la orientación a las metas de aprendizaje predijo (después de cuatro a seis semanas) el uso de estrategias de aprendizaje profundas para la lectura. Las metas de aprendizaje también han sido asociadas a niveles altos de rendimiento académico (Botsas & Padeliadu, 2003).…”
Section: Académicosunclassified
“…Entre los investigadores hay acuerdo sobre las consecuencias positivas asociadas a las metas de aprendizaje; se ha observado, por ejemplo, el uso de ciertas estrategias de aprendizaje que específicamente favorecen el procesamiento profundo de la información (entre ellas se encuentran las estrategias de organización y elaboración), valiéndose también del uso de estrategias metacognitivas (Covington, 2000) y generando con ello un mejor rendimiento académico (Botsas & Padeliadu, 2003). En relación con las metas de rendimiento, se ha encontrado resultados diferentes, básicamente asociados a los dos tipos de metas de rendimiento estudiados: de aproximación y de evitación.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Factor that impedes reading comprehension in many students with learning disabilities according to Bostas and Padeliadu (2003) is inability to employ necessary skills to get meaning from texts. Inability to use effective strategies during comprehension as asserted by Bostas and Padeliadu (2003) arises from difficulties in remembering recall strategies and failure to use and monitor strategies to be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inability to use effective strategies during comprehension as asserted by Bostas and Padeliadu (2003) arises from difficulties in remembering recall strategies and failure to use and monitor strategies to be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%