2006
DOI: 10.1007/11691792_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goal Decomposition Tree: An Agent Model to Generate a Validated Agent Behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For about 6 years, the model of Goal Decomposition Trees (GDT) has been developed to help to formally specify agents and multiagent systems [24][25][26]32]. This model allows the formal specification of agents by a set of properties and a behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For about 6 years, the model of Goal Decomposition Trees (GDT) has been developed to help to formally specify agents and multiagent systems [24][25][26]32]. This model allows the formal specification of agents by a set of properties and a behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GDT provides traceability between goals (both top-down and bottom up) using logical inferences through a set of decomposition operators, allowing claims on a goal's achievement based on its sub-goals' achievement. Considering [20] we shift from goal-agent to goal-process coupling. Within the scope of this paper a goal is a state of a process in terms of the quality of a service property that is intended to be achieved (e.g.…”
Section: Step 1: Build Goal Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method utilizes the process design framework [19] and the goal decomposition tree (GDT) proposed by [20] in agent programming. The process design framework is used as a reference to ensure that all essential process concepts are addressed and comprehensively represented, as exemplified in [21].…”
Section: Step 1: Build Goal Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interaction is performed to achieve something, and this leads to other properties. Some agent-oriented methods propose to define "external goals" [20]. Another simple solution is to define preconditions and post-conditions.…”
Section: Reification Of the Interaction Concept For Agent Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches [20] emphasise that a certain plan or organisational or individual behaviour exists because of a goal. The difference between the IDR diagram and a goal decomposition is that goals focus on "what" should be done, whereas interactions specify also the structure, possibly the order, and the potential participants.…”
Section: Different Ways To Use Idrsmentioning
confidence: 99%