Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00841.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goal Attainment Scaling in paediatric rehabilitation: a report on the clinical training of an interdisciplinary team

Abstract: The experiences reported in this paper support the further development of training procedures for GAS before it can be used as an outcome measure in effect studies. The findings may be helpful in introducing GAS in the field of childhood disability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Can be time consuming and difficult to score. Training is strongly recommended prior to use in effect studies with children [74]. Reliability, validity and responsiveness for children functioning at GMFCS IV and V need further development.…”
Section: Adequate Gas [44] (A and P)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Can be time consuming and difficult to score. Training is strongly recommended prior to use in effect studies with children [74]. Reliability, validity and responsiveness for children functioning at GMFCS IV and V need further development.…”
Section: Adequate Gas [44] (A and P)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the GAS, the most important functional goal for the affected arm and hand was broken down into attainable subgoals during the preintervention assessment with the parents. 30,33 In this study, the perceived outcome was scaled from −3 to +2. A score of −3 indicated a level lower than the initial performance level, −2 indicated an unchanged level of performance, −1 indicated a level lower than the desired outcome, 0 indicated the desired outcome level had been achieved, +1 indicated somewhat more improvement than expected, and +2 indicated much more improvement than expected (a total of 6 levels of performance).…”
Section: Outcome Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scores before and after the intervention were then compared. A Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) was used with negotiated practical goals providing an individualized, criterion-referenced measure of change (19,20). The scale is ranked as follows: -2 (baseline), -1 (outcome less than expected), 0 (expected outcome), +1 (outtcome greater than expected), +2 (outcome much greater than expected).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%