2014
DOI: 10.4161/viru.29755
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Go in for the kill: How plants deploy effector-triggered immunity to combat pathogens

Abstract: Plant resistance (R) proteins perceive specific pathogen effectors from diverse plant pathogens to initiate defense responses, designated effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Plant R proteins are mostly nucleotide binding-leucine rich repeat (NB-LRR) proteins, which recognize pathogen effectors directly or indirectly through sophisticated mechanisms. Upon activation by effector proteins, R proteins elicit robust defense responses, including a rapid burst of reactive oxygen species (ROS), induced biosynthesis and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0
13

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
(150 reference statements)
1
74
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…While reminiscent of a defence response, this is distinct from the paradigm of well-characterized defence mechanisms in plants (that is, Resistance ( R ) genes) that achieve specificity at the perception level 41 , but where the inputs from perception of diverse pathogens converge on largely overlapping downstream pathways 42 . Known downstream defence mechanisms are largely blunt force antimicrobial instruments such as plant cell death, reactive oxygen species production, or production of broad-spectrum antimicrobials 43,44 that would not be expected to limit the growth of a narrow group of bacterial taxa. We also did not detect increased expression of defence genes in incompatible accessions; in fact, defence gene induction was more closely correlated with compatibility (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While reminiscent of a defence response, this is distinct from the paradigm of well-characterized defence mechanisms in plants (that is, Resistance ( R ) genes) that achieve specificity at the perception level 41 , but where the inputs from perception of diverse pathogens converge on largely overlapping downstream pathways 42 . Known downstream defence mechanisms are largely blunt force antimicrobial instruments such as plant cell death, reactive oxygen species production, or production of broad-spectrum antimicrobials 43,44 that would not be expected to limit the growth of a narrow group of bacterial taxa. We also did not detect increased expression of defence genes in incompatible accessions; in fact, defence gene induction was more closely correlated with compatibility (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This so-called effector-triggered susceptibility is counteracted by a second line of plant defense responses, designated ETI, which is activated by the products of plant resistance ( R ) genes upon detection of individual effector proteins (Wu et al. 2014; Cui, Tsuda and Parker 2015) (Fig. 1A).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One hallmark of ETI is the hypersensitive response, in which the infection site rapidly undergoes programmed cell death (PCD) that arrests the growth and spread of the pathogen (Wu et al, 2014;Zebell and Dong, 2015). Given its severe consequences for cell fate and its effectiveness in halting pathogen ingress, PCD must be tightly regulated in the absence of pathogen attack (Mukhtar et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%