GO Bon Juan

Clemente, Tina S.; Shih, Chih-yu

doi:10.4324/9780429508189-14

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We find servers announcing gws (1.69 K) and AkamaiGHost (1.44 K), hinting at even more Google and Akamai installations. The fourth largest group of servers announces Caddy (356) as the server string, this server uses the quic-go [4] library and can also be used as a reverse proxy for other TCP-only servers. Takeaway.…”

Section: Enumerating Quic Ipv4 Hostsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To account for mandatory Server Name Indication (SNI), it can present a hostname that is necessary for the server to deliver correct certificates when hosting multiple sites on a single server. We base our tool [1] on the quic-go [4] library which we extended to enable tracing within the connection establishment to extract all handshake parameters (see Figure 1). IP-based Certificate Scan.…”

Section: Enumerating Quic Domain Namesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A First Look at QUIC in the Wild

Rüth

Poese

Dietzel³

et al. 2018

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For the first time since the establishment of TCP and UDP, the Internet transport layer is subject to a major change by the introduction of QUIC. Initiated by Google in 2012, QUIC provides a reliable, connection-oriented low-latency and fully encrypted transport. In this paper, we provide the first broad assessment of QUIC usage in the wild. We monitor the entire IPv4 address space since August 2016 and about 46% of the DNS namespace to detected QUIC-capable infrastructures. Our scans show that the number of QUIC-capable IPs has more than tripled since then to over 617.59 K. We find around 161K domains hosted on QUIC-enabled infrastructure, but only 15K of them present valid certificates over QUIC. Second, we analyze one year of traffic traces provided by MAWI, one day of a major European tier-1 ISP and from a large IXP to understand the dominance of QUIC in the Internet traffic mix. We find QUIC to account for 2.6% to 9.1% of the current Internet traffic, depending on the vantage point. This share is dominated by Google pushing up to 42.1% of its traffic via QUIC.

show abstract

Section: Enumerating Quic Ipv4 Hostsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Enumerating Quic Domain Namesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A First Look at QUIC in the Wild

Rüth

Poese

Dietzel³

et al. 2018

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The primary reason for this deviation from the norm is the stated goal to implement all of this inside the application -high-quality library implementations of QUIC which can be made to work on top of SCION are readily available. Our implementation is based on the quic-go library [11] as well as Go's built-in HTTP implementation.…”

Section: Prototype Implementationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tango or Square Dance? How Tightly Should we Integrate Network Functionality in Browsers?

Davidson¹,

Frei²,

Gartner³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The question at which layer network functionality is presented or abstracted remains a research challenge. Traditionally, network functionality was either placed into the core network, middleboxes, or into the operating system -but recent developments have expanded the design space to directly introduce functionality into the application (and in particular into the browser) as a way to expose it to the user.Given the context of emerging path-aware networking technology, an interesting question arises: which layer should handle the new features? We argue that the browser is becoming a powerful platform for network innovation, where even user-driven properties can be implemented in an OSagnostic fashion. We demonstrate the feasibility of geo-fenced browsing using a prototype browser extension, realized by the SCION path-aware networking architecture, without introducing any significant performance overheads.

show abstract

GO Bon Juan

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

A First Look at QUIC in the Wild

A First Look at QUIC in the Wild

Tango or Square Dance? How Tightly Should we Integrate Network Functionality in Browsers?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About