Proceedings of the 2020 International Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation 2020
DOI: 10.33012/2020.17147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GNSS Spoofing Detection and Identification Based on Clock Drift Monitoring Using Only One Signal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, to increase the probability of spoofing detection, it can be recommended to use as large antenna baselines as possible. At the same time, even with the baseline length at the GPS L1 wavelength level (Figure 7), it is still possible to reasonably choose the threshold for criterion (15). Finally, it can be argued that the probability of spoofing detection does not practically depend on the accuracy of the SINS (the moving average remains at 0.15 m for both the low-grade and navigation-grade SINSs in Figures 9 and 10), at least for the selected time interval.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, to increase the probability of spoofing detection, it can be recommended to use as large antenna baselines as possible. At the same time, even with the baseline length at the GPS L1 wavelength level (Figure 7), it is still possible to reasonably choose the threshold for criterion (15). Finally, it can be argued that the probability of spoofing detection does not practically depend on the accuracy of the SINS (the moving average remains at 0.15 m for both the low-grade and navigation-grade SINSs in Figures 9 and 10), at least for the selected time interval.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of approaches are used to detect GNSS spoofing. For example, spoofing detection based on clock bias or drift monitoring is described in [15,16]. A fundamentally different method based on abnormal energy in quadrature (Q) channel correlators is proposed in [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [21], a technique based on repeated measurements of a single GNSS signal is presented, identifying spoofing signals based on the characteristic clock drift of the adversarial transmitter. The proposed countermeasure requires that the legitimate receiver is equipped with a low drift clock, e.g., an atomic clock or an oven compensated oscillator.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it cannot safeguard static receivers. Additionally, [16] and [21] require access to low level signal properties that often are not available in consumer grade receivers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%