GnRHa (‘Puberty Blockers’) and Cross Sex Hormones for Children and Adolescents: Informed Consent, Personhood and Freedom of Expression

Abstract

Ethical concerns have been raised about routine practice in paediatric gender clinics. We discuss informed consent and the risk of iatrogenesis in the prescribing of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHas) and cross sex hormones to children and adolescents respectively. We place those clinical concerns in a wider societal context and invite consideration of two further relevant ethical domains: competing rights-based claims about male and female personhood; and freedom of expression about those claims. When reflecting on the assessment and medicalization of children and adolescents presenting at gender clinics, the matters of informed consent and iatrogenic risk should be the most pressing for clinicians. However, this is not just a matter of medical ethics, it also implies the need for a full ethical debate on competing notions of personhood and the defence of freedom of expression about transgender and its implications within contemporary democracies. keywords Sex, gender, transgender, capacity, iatrogenesis This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Taking the Long Way Around: Towards A Depathologized Ethical Framework of Gender-Affirming Care for Trans Youth

“…A more ludicrous example can be seen in Pilgrim and Entwistle’s ethical discussion on youth capacity to consent to GAC, where a single case of necrotizing fasciitis after gender-affirming surgery is cited as a meaningful consideration in the broader ethics of such procedures, as though necrotizing fasciitis is not an equivalent risk in countless procedures performed for young patients. 65 Trans youth here are surreptitiously othered as politically and ethically distinct from their cisgender peers, furthering a broader regulatory project of labeling and segregating deviance.…”

British mental healthcare responses to adult homosexuality and gender non-conforming children at the turn of the twenty-first century

“…For example, those working with anorexic teenagers would not agree with a child that she or he was overweight, when in fact they were visibly skeletal, but might a different stance be warranted with other clinical groups, such as gender non-conforming children, and, if so, why? This ethical problematic was at the centre of the newly emerging GIDS and its service philosophy (Pilgrim and Entwistle, 2020; Steensma, Wensing-Kruger and Klink, 2017).…”

Sex, gender and nursing

“…However, an uncritical approach to affirmation may neglect some of the legal and ethical practice implications that are likely to increasingly impact nursing care and treatment. These include criticisms of the use of puberty blockers for young people who express feelings of gender dysphoria (Pilgrim & Entwistle, 2020), and the associated issue of consent to potentially irreversible life changing treatment such as surgical removal of healthy tissue for those who seek physical transition. For those who do not share the view that gender self-identification is an acceptable alternative to biological sex, there is also concern about the impact on single sex, safe spaces for women and the option to request care by a female professional.…”