2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: the role of endometrial receptivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
32
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(23 reference statements)
4
32
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, a recent meta analysis comparing outcomes between antagonist and agonist cycles, including 13 randomized clinical trials with a range of 2-101 pregnant cases for each study, miscarriage rates were not found to be different (11.7% vs 11.5%) [18]. However, the studies in this meta analysis in the Cochrane review did not take into account the plurality of gestations and the definitions of miscarriage were not uniform [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Short Communicationmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this regard, a recent meta analysis comparing outcomes between antagonist and agonist cycles, including 13 randomized clinical trials with a range of 2-101 pregnant cases for each study, miscarriage rates were not found to be different (11.7% vs 11.5%) [18]. However, the studies in this meta analysis in the Cochrane review did not take into account the plurality of gestations and the definitions of miscarriage were not uniform [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Short Communicationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In order to determine whether this subtle clinical outcome difference between those GnRH analogues could be integral to endometrial microenvironment, some studies addressed endometrium as a confounding factor. Histologically no apparent differences were found enough to detect any deleterious effects of GnRH antagonists; others found significant ultrastructural differences such as different expressions of growth factors and chemokins from endometrial cells exposed to GnRH agonists and antagonists [9][10][11][12]. Bearing in mind that GnRH receptors exist on endometrium, it may be speculated that endometrial factor could be related to this clinical outcome difference between GnRH agonists and antagonists.…”
Section: Short Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ratio was significantly higher in the D1-hCG treatment group compared to Controls. Yet, several studies consider top quality embryos those with higher implantation ability [33], Check et al [34] analyzed a single embryo transfer data basis and reported that six, seven or eight-cell embryos produces similar pregnancy rates. Consequently, the translation of D1-hCG's better quality embryos into a significantly improved biochemical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and on-going pregnancy rate per transfer might still under debate and scientific testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the effect of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH agonist and antagonist on endometrium receptivity or implantation with conflicting results. [3][4][5][6][7][8] Moreover, GnRH antagonist for pituitary down regulation during ovulation induction has been seen to directly act on extra pituitary receptor, including the endometrium and has been associated with decrease endometrial receptivity. 9 There are few studies examining the association between endometrial receptivity measured in the form of endometrial blood flow with colour Doppler and clinical outcome in the GnRH antagonist protocol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%