2018
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.13958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GNAT toxins of bacterial toxin–antitoxin systems: acetylation of charged tRNAs to inhibit translation

Abstract: GCN5-related N-acetyltransferase (GNAT) is a huge superfamily of proteins spanning the prokaryotic and eukaryotic domains of life. GNAT proteins usually transfer an acetyl group from acetyl-CoA to a wide variety of substrates ranging from aminoglycoside antibiotics to large macromolecules. Type II toxin-antitoxin (TA) modules are typically bicistronic and widespread in bacterial and archael genomes with diverse cellular functions. Recently, a novel family of type II TA toxins was described, which presents a GN… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major class of EVE proteins which formed a distinct cluster in our CLANS analysis (purple in Figure 2), is a fusion of EVE to the C-terminus of a GNAT-like acetyltransferase, often with a PIN RNase domain at the N-terminus ( Figure 7). GNAT and PIN domains both frequently function as toxins (Makarova, Wolf, and Koonin 2009;Matelska, Steczkiewicz, and Ginalski 2017;Yeo 2018). This variety of EVE proteins has been described previously in some detail by Iyer et al, who proposed that these proteins acetylate a DNA base, although the frequent presence of a PIN domain suggests that these systems employ RNA as a target or guide (Iyer et al 2013).…”
Section: Eve Domains In Toxin-antitoxin Systemsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A major class of EVE proteins which formed a distinct cluster in our CLANS analysis (purple in Figure 2), is a fusion of EVE to the C-terminus of a GNAT-like acetyltransferase, often with a PIN RNase domain at the N-terminus ( Figure 7). GNAT and PIN domains both frequently function as toxins (Makarova, Wolf, and Koonin 2009;Matelska, Steczkiewicz, and Ginalski 2017;Yeo 2018). This variety of EVE proteins has been described previously in some detail by Iyer et al, who proposed that these proteins acetylate a DNA base, although the frequent presence of a PIN domain suggests that these systems employ RNA as a target or guide (Iyer et al 2013).…”
Section: Eve Domains In Toxin-antitoxin Systemsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The PIN domain RNases function as toxins in a broad variety of bacterial, and especially, archaeal TA systems (Matelska, Steczkiewicz, and Ginalski 2017;Makarova, Wolf, and Koonin 2009). The GNAT domains also typically function as toxins (Yeo 2018), and HTH domain-containing antitoxins have been described as well (Chan, Espinosa, and Yeo 2016). The mechanistic details of these (PIN)-GNAT-EVE protein activities await experimental investigation, but some functional hints emerged from our analysis.…”
Section: Eve Domains In Toxin-antitoxin Systemsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We screened for TA genes and predicted a total of 67 putative TA systems with Rasta bacteria, TADB, and PSI-BLAST. To make the classification more accurate, we used the TA systems of E. coli [ 4 ], Klebsiella pneumoniae [ 18 ], and Mycobacterium [ 5 , 19 ] as modal and manually curated each TA system and classified them into different families. We found type I, II, III, IV, and type V TA systems in S. aureus on the basis of software prediction, conserved domain analysis, and orthologues searches from Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GNATs-like TA system is the new addition of the TA family that can prevent peptide bond formation by acetylating tRNA and inhibiting translation in Salmonella and Klebsilla [ 18 , 29 ]. The TacT toxin inhibits translation via acetylating the initiator tRNA, and induces persister cell formation [ 29 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%