2014
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbu118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glycosylated Hemoglobin Testing in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project

Abstract: Collection of HbA1C in Wave 2 permits researchers to examine the relationship between HbA1C and new health and social measures added in Wave 2, and to identify factors related to the change in HbA1C. Changes in collection protocol and labs between waves may have yielded small systematic differences that require analysts to carefully interpret absolute HbA1C values. We recommend analytic methods for cross wave differences in HbA1C and steps to ensure cross wave comparability in future studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Wave 2, HbA1c assays were conducted using automated ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (IE-HPLC) performed on a Bio-Rad Variant II Hemoglobin Testing System. Both methods are National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) certified, and between-wave differences in NSHAP HbA1c measurements have been shown to be comparable to those observed in other large, national studies (Gregg et al, 2014). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For Wave 2, HbA1c assays were conducted using automated ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (IE-HPLC) performed on a Bio-Rad Variant II Hemoglobin Testing System. Both methods are National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) certified, and between-wave differences in NSHAP HbA1c measurements have been shown to be comparable to those observed in other large, national studies (Gregg et al, 2014). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Second, the change in method of HbA1c ascertainment between waves raises the possibility that HbA1c measurement precision or accuracy changed by wave. However, the two methods have been shown to be comparable with each other within the NSHAP cohort and with gold-standard venous sampling techniques in several studies, suggesting that our use of these measures in both waves is appropriate (Gregg et al, 2014; Lacher et al, 2013; Parkes et al, 1999). Third, exposure error for NO 2 and to a lesser extent PM 2.5 is probable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The paired samples not only provide an important check on the quality of the measurements but also provide insurance in situations like the example of HPLC-based measures of HbA1c described above. Moreover, as noted by Gregg et al (2014), a validated cross-walk between DBS and venous blood values collected from each wave of a study will facilitate longitudinal analyses of DBS-based results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%