1981
DOI: 10.3109/01443618109067368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glycosylated haemoglobin in the assessment of diabetic control in pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our conclusions therefore agree with Kbbberling et al [3] in that the chlorpropamide alcohol flush test is unsuitable for genetic counselling and should not be used for the prognostic labelling of non-insulin dependent diabetic patients. …”
Section: The Prevalence Of Chlorpropamide Alcohol Flushing In Non-inssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our conclusions therefore agree with Kbbberling et al [3] in that the chlorpropamide alcohol flush test is unsuitable for genetic counselling and should not be used for the prognostic labelling of non-insulin dependent diabetic patients. …”
Section: The Prevalence Of Chlorpropamide Alcohol Flushing In Non-inssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Dear Sir, Leslie and Pyke have suggested that the chlorproparnide alcohol flush is a dominantly inherited trait in non-insulin dependent diabetics which is associated with a low prevalence of severe retinopathy [1,2], K6bberling and his colleagues have recently been unable to confirm these observations [3]. They found that the chlorpropamide alcohol flush was not specific for non-insulin dependent diabetics and they were unable to find any differences in the distribution of the chlorpropamide alcohol flush in diabetics with or without a family history of the disease.…”
Section: The Prevalence Of Chlorpropamide Alcohol Flushing In Non-insmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We too, have measured cord blood C-peptide and glucose, the former after initial precipitation of insulin antibodies with polyethylene glycol [2], to compare the true B cell response of a group of 44 infants of insulinrequiring diabetic mothers with 32 infants of non-diabetic mothers. We divided the infants of diabetic mothers into two groups dependent upon the quality of their mothers' blood glucose control and their glycosylated haemoglobin concentration [3] and not on the basis of the presence or absence of insulin antibodies. The results are presented below as group means + one standard deviation.…”
Section: Cord Blood C-peptide: Glucose Ratio -A Good Indicator Of B Cmentioning
confidence: 99%