1989
DOI: 10.1002/jlac.198919890276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glycosyl Imidates, 42 Selectively Protected Lactose and 2‐Azido Lactose, Building Blocks for Glycolipid Synthesis

Abstract: Performing regioselective alkylation at 3′‐OH of benzyl β‐lactoside 1 by the stannylation method we prepared the 3′‐OH‐ and 4′‐OH‐unprotected lactose derivatives 5 and 10 and the 4′‐OH‐unprotected lactose derivative 9 containing a different protecting group at 3′‐OH, suitable for further transformations. These building blocks are valuable glycosyl acceptors in glycolipid synthesis. For the synthesis of glycosyl donors with Gal(β1 → 4)GlcNAc‐structure we used the 2‐azido lactose derivative 19. By regioselective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of Et,N.SO, gave 51 % of a 4:1 mixture of the 3-and 2-sulfates 13a/14a and 10% of the 2,3-disulfate 15a. Sulfation of both the lactose derivative 16 [68] and the corresponding stannanediyl acetal 17 gave the 3-sulfate 18a as the sole monosulfated product in 77 and 83% yield, respectively. Sulfation of 16 occurred more slowly and also gave 11 YO of the disulfate 19a.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…of Et,N.SO, gave 51 % of a 4:1 mixture of the 3-and 2-sulfates 13a/14a and 10% of the 2,3-disulfate 15a. Sulfation of both the lactose derivative 16 [68] and the corresponding stannanediyl acetal 17 gave the 3-sulfate 18a as the sole monosulfated product in 77 and 83% yield, respectively. Sulfation of 16 occurred more slowly and also gave 11 YO of the disulfate 19a.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Chemoselective 1-O-deacetylation with hydrazinium acetate in DMF (Ǟ 2) and then reaction with trichloroacetonitrile in the presence of DBU as base afforded the desired trichloroacetimidate 3 as glucosyl donor. The glycosylation of known 6-O-, 3-O-, and 4-O-unprotected sugars 4a, [26] 4b, [27] and 4c [28] as acceptors ( Figure 1) with 3 as donor in the presence of TMSOTf as catalyst in dichloromethane led exclusively to β-linked glycosides 5a-c in satisfactory yields. Owing to the fluorescent properties of the products, monitoring of the reaction by TLC was convenient.…”
Section: Dpm Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selective removal of the 1-O-acetyl group with hydrazinium acetate (Ǟ 11) and base-catalyzed reaction with trichloroacetonitrile led to trichloroacetimidate 12. Glycosylation of acceptors 4a-e [27][28][29]33] with 12 under standard conditions, that is, trimethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate catalysis in dichloromethane, afforded the desired β-glycosides in almost quantitative yields (Scheme 4), thus illustrating the power of this glycosyl donor. However, unexpectedly, the cleavage of the DMG group turned out to be very difficult; neither hydrazine in ethanol nor base and ensuing acid treatment was successful.…”
Section: The Dmg Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The organic layer was dried (MgSO,) and concentrated. The brown residue was purified by flash chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 8:2) to give 4.00 g (86%) sirup; 0-(2-azido-3,6-di-O-benzyl-2-deoxy-~-~-glucopyranosyl) -(1-3 j-0-(2,4,6-tvi-O-benzyl-~-~-galactopyranosyl) -(1-4) -0-(2-azido-3,6-di-O-benzyl-2-deoxy-~-~-gEucopyranoside j (14): A solution of the trichloroacetimidate 12 (200 mg, 0.20 mmol) and the acceptor substrate 13 (186 mg, 0.20 mmol) in the minimal amount of dichloromethane necessary for dissolution (ca. 3 ml) was cooled to -20°C under argon, and then n-hexane was added (8 ml).…”
Section: -0-(3-0-allyl-246-tri-o-benzyl-~-~-galactopyranosyl) -2-amentioning
confidence: 99%