2020
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c05644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glycoform Differentiation by a Targeted, Self-Assembled, Pattern-Generating Protein Surface Sensor

Abstract: A method for generating targeted, pattern-generating, protein surface sensors via the self-assembly of modified oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) is described. The simplicity by which these systems can be created enabled the development of a sensor that can straightforwardly discriminate between distinct glycoform populations. By using this sensor to identify glycosylation states of a therapeutic protein, we demonstrate the diagnostic potential of this approach as well as the feasibility of integrating a wealth of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, this recognition process generates a distinct fluorescence fingerprint that can be statistically analyzed by machine learning algorithms to identify individual target analytes. This strategy aligns with the array-based sensing, which is an attractive alternative to the conventional lock-and-key sensing that employs one specific receptor (e.g., antibodies) to detect one target analyte. − An array-based sensing strategy is modeled after the sensing mechanism of the mammalian olfactory system, where an array of cross-reactive receptors signals a specific pattern for each analyte. Given that these cross-reactive receptors can be synthetically generated, this strategy provides enormous flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and diversity to suit many sensing challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, this recognition process generates a distinct fluorescence fingerprint that can be statistically analyzed by machine learning algorithms to identify individual target analytes. This strategy aligns with the array-based sensing, which is an attractive alternative to the conventional lock-and-key sensing that employs one specific receptor (e.g., antibodies) to detect one target analyte. − An array-based sensing strategy is modeled after the sensing mechanism of the mammalian olfactory system, where an array of cross-reactive receptors signals a specific pattern for each analyte. Given that these cross-reactive receptors can be synthetically generated, this strategy provides enormous flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and diversity to suit many sensing challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthetic host–guest systems are particularly well suited to sensor arrays, as they are rarely ideally selective, but small structural changes in the host can perturb binding preferences to a set of guests, providing a set of differential receptors. Accordingly, sensor arrays based on host–guest IDAs have been developed for a broad range of analytes. − Nonetheless, the workflow for developing a new sensor array has several significant challenges: Individual receptors must be identified, synthesized, and purified, and an appropriate environmentally sensitive dye must be identified for each receptor. Moreover, a set of receptors must be developed for each new set of analytes, which can often involve significant effort in multistep syntheses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To track the dynamic formation of several molecular species in solution, a new class of fluorescent molecular probes [25][26][27][28][29] , termed ID-probes 28 was recently developed. Unlike conventional small molecule-based probes, which generally bind a single analyte and produce a single fluorescence output, ID-probes combine several fluorophores and non-specific (or partially specific) recognition elements that enable them to interact with various different molecular species in a mixture and generate unique identification (ID) fingerprints for different analytes and their combinations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%