1989
DOI: 10.1210/jcem-69-3-571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glyburide Enhances the Responsiveness of the β-Cell to Glucose but Does not Correct the Abnormal Patterns of Insulin Secretion in Noninsulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus*

Abstract: Eleven patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were studied before and after 6-10 weeks of glyburide therapy. Patients were studied during a 24-h period on a mixed diet comprising 30 Cal/kg divided into three meals. The following day a hyperglycemic clamp study was performed, with glucose levels clamped at 300 mg/dL (16.7 mmol/L) for a 3-h period. Insulin secretion rates were calculated by deconvolution of peripheral C-peptide concentrations using individual C-peptide clearance kinetics derived af… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
31
0
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These specific mechanistic findings are in accordance with the previous observation that acute tolbutamide infusion in healthy humans can increase the amplitude of insulin concentration profiles without modifying the high-frequency oscillatory rate (11). Similarly, glyburide enhanced insulin secretion in diabetic patients by augmenting oscillatory amplitude in a 24-h study of ultradian oscillations (12). In nondiabetic dogs, tolbutamide infusion and ingestion likewise stimulated insulin secretion by dual effects on pulsatile secretion and basal secretion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These specific mechanistic findings are in accordance with the previous observation that acute tolbutamide infusion in healthy humans can increase the amplitude of insulin concentration profiles without modifying the high-frequency oscillatory rate (11). Similarly, glyburide enhanced insulin secretion in diabetic patients by augmenting oscillatory amplitude in a 24-h study of ultradian oscillations (12). In nondiabetic dogs, tolbutamide infusion and ingestion likewise stimulated insulin secretion by dual effects on pulsatile secretion and basal secretion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Substrates (glucose), hormones (glucagon-like peptide [GLP]-1, somatostatin, and IGF-1), and antidiabetic compounds that regulate insulin secretion seem to exert their actions primarily via modulation of insulin secretory burst mass rather than frequency (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). Despite the widespread clinical use of insulin secretagogues in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, the influence of these antidiabetic drugs on the oscillatory pattern of insulin release has been elucidated only sparingly in diabetic humans (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could not generally be expected because the pulsatility of insulin secretion has been found impaired in previous studies in type 2 diabetic patients (2,4,13,16) and even in nondiabetic first-degree relatives of type 2 diabetic patients (14,15). Given the impaired insulin secretory capability of B-cells in type 2 diabetic patients (29) and the reduced effectiveness of insulin secretagogues like glucose (30) and sulfonylureas (31), it may even be considered remarkable that GLP-1 is able to elicit a similar effect on insulin secretory burst mass as has previously been demonstrated in healthy subjects (11). A difference to this previous study is, however, that a fourfold increment in secretory burst mass was described in healthy subjects (11), whereas in the present study, GLP-1 led to an increment of only 68 and 45% in type 2 diabetic patients and subjects with IGT, respectively (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, sulfonylureas, as the long-acting insulin secretagogues, probably cause hypoglycemia and body weight gain and are insufficient to control postprandial hyperglycemia (Shapiro et al, 1989;UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group, 1998). Furthermore, problems including secondary failure have been suggested previously (Salas and Caro, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%