2022
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.16115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gluten–starch interface characteristics and wheat dough rheology—Insights from hybrid artificial systems

Abstract: Referring to the total surface existing in wheat dough, gluten–starch interfaces are a major component. However, their impact on dough rheology is largely unclear. Common viewpoints, based on starch surface modifications or reconstitution experiments, failed to show unambiguous relations of interface characteristics and dough rheology. Observing hybrid artificial dough systems with defined particle surface functionalization gives a new perspective. Since surface functionalization standardizes particle–polymer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, freezing disrupts the hydrophobic and ionic bonds of proteins, along with changes in protein stereo conformation. This leads to the unregulated movement of water within the spaces of the gluten network structure, consequently reducing its water‐binding capacity (Brandner et al., 2022). After 60 days of freezing, the weight loss rates of LF‐, QF‐, UF‐, and PF‐doughs were 87.80%, 78.26%, 56.58%, and 72.22%, respectively, compared with that of the control.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, freezing disrupts the hydrophobic and ionic bonds of proteins, along with changes in protein stereo conformation. This leads to the unregulated movement of water within the spaces of the gluten network structure, consequently reducing its water‐binding capacity (Brandner et al., 2022). After 60 days of freezing, the weight loss rates of LF‐, QF‐, UF‐, and PF‐doughs were 87.80%, 78.26%, 56.58%, and 72.22%, respectively, compared with that of the control.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in rice and buckwheat protein quality and quantity may contribute to the differences in dough behavior. Additionally, dough behavior is impacted by the loss of adhesion between protein and starch [ 35 , 36 ]. Damaged starch granules probably decreased adhesion, resulting in a weaker dough with a low ability to accumulate stress.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tested buckwheat doughs did not exhibit any clear trend. Bimodal particle size distribution in buckwheat flours may impact dough behavior, since the homogeneity of particle distribution impacts the dough behavior during the large-scale deformation test and the fracture stress [ 35 , 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loss of adhesion between polymers or particles is known as the Payne effect in material science. The breakdown of particle–particle interactions or the detachment of particles from polymers causes a reduction of moduli through the dissipation of energy by the facilitated sliding of polymer chains/particles [ 98 ], which explains the decrease in G ′ for soft wheat flour dough during the Farinograph mixing of peak to 10 min after the peak [ 96 ]. Apart from the interactions between gliadins and HMW-glutenins, Bonilla et al [ 96 ] also evaluated the interactions between gliadins and LMW-glutenins through the PNA software and reported a decrease in the area and in the number of junctions for the gliadin-LMW-glutenin network when the dough was mixed from peak to 10 min after the peak.…”
Section: Fundamental Non-linear Rheological Methods For Wheat Flour Q...mentioning
confidence: 99%