2019
DOI: 10.3329/birdem.v9i3.43083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glutamic acid decarboxylase positivity in selected group of Bangladeshi type 2 diabetic patients

Abstract: Background: Many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) test positive for glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD).These individuals have been referred to as having latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) or type 1.5 diabetes. LADA refers to a specific type of diabetes affecting adult patients, characterized by presence of islet auto-antibodies, insulin independence at the time of diagnosis and characterized by slower beta cell destruction. The aim of this study was to indentify GAD positivity in a selecte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…12 In a recent study conducted by Islam N et al described the increased presence of GAD antibody level (10.0%) in newly diagnosed adult diabetic patients (mostly more than 35 years of age). 13 But here it did not found significant GAD positivity in this study, as of previous study in young diabetic patients of less than 30 years of age. 12 In the present study, it was found the ICA was significantly high in young diabetic patients (mostly below 25 years of age).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…12 In a recent study conducted by Islam N et al described the increased presence of GAD antibody level (10.0%) in newly diagnosed adult diabetic patients (mostly more than 35 years of age). 13 But here it did not found significant GAD positivity in this study, as of previous study in young diabetic patients of less than 30 years of age. 12 In the present study, it was found the ICA was significantly high in young diabetic patients (mostly below 25 years of age).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%