2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glucose oxidase immobilization on a novel cellulose acetate–polymethylmethacrylate membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Being V 0 max directly related to the efficiency of the enzyme's active site and K 0 M inversely related to the affinity of the enzyme for the substrate, the variation of those values due to the immobilization procedure indicate that the efficiency of GOx's active site and GOx affinity for glucose is reduced with respect to free GOx in solution. This finding can be explained taking into account that the presence of Nafion leads to substrate diffusion and charge transfer limitations in the immobilized form of GOx, in agreement with previous reports [42][43][44]. This becomes particularly evident if kinetic parameters of the two immobilized GOx samples (with and without MWCNTs) are compared.…”
Section: Effect Of Mwcnts On Electron-transfer and Bioelectrocatalytisupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Being V 0 max directly related to the efficiency of the enzyme's active site and K 0 M inversely related to the affinity of the enzyme for the substrate, the variation of those values due to the immobilization procedure indicate that the efficiency of GOx's active site and GOx affinity for glucose is reduced with respect to free GOx in solution. This finding can be explained taking into account that the presence of Nafion leads to substrate diffusion and charge transfer limitations in the immobilized form of GOx, in agreement with previous reports [42][43][44]. This becomes particularly evident if kinetic parameters of the two immobilized GOx samples (with and without MWCNTs) are compared.…”
Section: Effect Of Mwcnts On Electron-transfer and Bioelectrocatalytisupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, this decreasing slope in bioactivity of the immobilized GOD in the nanochannels is much slower than the results reported for the free GOD. [37][38][39] In the present system, the immobilized GOD still retains 85 % of the optimum activity of GOD, even at pH 9.0, thus demonstrating that the bioactivity of the immobilized GOD can be protected by the nanochannel system. The present result demonstrates that bioassays of GOD immobilized in the nanochannel array of the PAA membrane can be operated over a wide range of solution pH values without sacrificing the activity significantly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…[27] Most important is the application of GOD in biosensors for the quantitative determination of glucose, e.g., in body fluids or food products. [27][28][29] For all these processes, immobilization and encapsulation of GOD is desired, in order to enhance reusability and operational stability.…”
Section: Preparation Of Polyelectrolyte Complex Capsulesmentioning
confidence: 99%