The peptide hormones insulin and glucagon (gcg) are inextricably linked in the normal control of glucose homeostasis and in the dysregulated glucose homeostasis that defines diabetes mellitus. Pancreatic islets secrete both insulin and gcg in a manner that is tightly juxtaposed. β Cells secrete insulin, a peptide hormone that promotes the uptake and storage of carbohydrates and other nutrients in skeletal muscle and fat, while simultaneously repressing gcg secretion from pancreatic α cells and glucose efflux from the liver. Although loss of insulin function is the most conspicuous cause of both type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), hyperglucagonemia also drives hyperglycemia. Pharmacological approaches to blunt gcg action have gained some traction as a potential antidiabetic approach. In PNAS, Okamoto et al. (1, 2) present two papers evaluating gcg blockade on islet physiology. First, they examine the mechanisms of α-cell hyperplasia, a phenomenon that stands as a potential roadblock in the use of these glucagon receptor (Gcgr) antagonists (1). Second, they reveal that Gcgr antagonism when insulin action is absent can lead to normoglycemia and β-cell expansion ( Fig. 1; ref. 2).Despite five decades of biochemical, physiological, and morphological research demonstrating that aberrant gcg production correlates with diabetes and suppression of gcg corrects the hyperglycemia of diabetes, gcg is not widely accepted as the direct cause of the metabolic abnormality. Since developing the first RIA for gcg in 1959 (3), we have studied gcg physiology and pathophysiology in rodents, dogs, and humans. In 1978, we showed that the gcg-suppressing agent somatostatin could ameliorate the metabolic disturbances of insulin deficiency (4). More recently, targeted disruption has gained traction as a potential treatment for diabetes.Small-molecule antagonists, antisense oligonucleotides, and antibodies that block Gcgr action have all been investigated in preclinical models and clinical trials as novel therapeutics for the treatment of diabetes. Although all strategies have shown improvements in glycemic control, several side effects (e.g., hypercholesterolemia, hyperglucagonemia, α-cell hyperplasia) have slowed development of these drugs as a clinical class (5). For fear of such nonspecific side effects, biological approaches with strong specificity may be a safer approach to antagonize Gcgr. Both antisense oligonucleotides and human antibodies against Gcgr show promise to promote glycemic control in patients. Interrupting gcg signaling can normalize glycemia in T1D and T2D rodent models, suggesting that modifying gcg action may be therapeutic for patients with either form of diabetes (5). Unfortunately, although effective at lowering blood glucose, interrupting gcg signaling also results in hyperglucagonemia and α-cell hyperplasia. This side effect raises concerns for the long-term safety of gcg antagonism. However, glycemia in patients with inactivating mutations in insulin receptor (Insr) is refractory to traditional i...