1978
DOI: 10.1785/bssa0680051313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glorified optics and wave propagation in nonplanar structure

Abstract: Waves propagating in varying nonplanar structure can produce many interesting phenomena, such as focusing, caustics, and triplications. A high-frequency technique based on the first-motion approximation, referred to as glorified optics, has been developed to generate synthetic seismograms for these types of problems. The technique, in its simplest form, uses the spreading rate of a beam with transmission and reflection coefficients along each possible ray path. The time behavior of each arrival is either that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past two decades, different numerical methods for studying scattering effects have been developed. These include the 2-D Aki-Larner method (Aki and Lamer, 1970) and its 3-D extension (Ohori• et al, 1990), the finite difference method (FDM) (Boore, 1972), the finite element method (FEM) (Smith, 1975), the glorified optics method (Hong and Helmberger, 1978), the boundary integral equation method (Dravinski, 1983;Khair et al, 1989;Mossessian and Dravinski, 1990) and the Gaussian bean method (Cerveny et al, 1982). Some hybrid methods which combine the merits of two numerical methods have also been developed ( Van den Berg, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past two decades, different numerical methods for studying scattering effects have been developed. These include the 2-D Aki-Larner method (Aki and Lamer, 1970) and its 3-D extension (Ohori• et al, 1990), the finite difference method (FDM) (Boore, 1972), the finite element method (FEM) (Smith, 1975), the glorified optics method (Hong and Helmberger, 1978), the boundary integral equation method (Dravinski, 1983;Khair et al, 1989;Mossessian and Dravinski, 1990) and the Gaussian bean method (Cerveny et al, 1982). Some hybrid methods which combine the merits of two numerical methods have also been developed ( Van den Berg, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%