2014
DOI: 10.1111/pin.12169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glomus tumor of the liver presenting as a cystic lesion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Folpe et al analyzed only three cases of visceral organ tumors (two in the lungs and one in the stomach), but did not analyze those without histological atypia [ 13 ]. Therefore, in agreement with Kihara et al [ 12 ], we believe that liver glomus tumors cannot be classified as malignant on the basis of their location and size alone, and that histological evaluation described in the other two criteria (ii) and (iii) should be of value. None of the five hepatic glomus tumor cases reported thus far have displayed histological abnormalities [ 7 12 ]; this is the first case arising in the liver with histological atypical features.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Folpe et al analyzed only three cases of visceral organ tumors (two in the lungs and one in the stomach), but did not analyze those without histological atypia [ 13 ]. Therefore, in agreement with Kihara et al [ 12 ], we believe that liver glomus tumors cannot be classified as malignant on the basis of their location and size alone, and that histological evaluation described in the other two criteria (ii) and (iii) should be of value. None of the five hepatic glomus tumor cases reported thus far have displayed histological abnormalities [ 7 12 ]; this is the first case arising in the liver with histological atypical features.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, in agreement with Kihara et al [ 12 ], we believe that liver glomus tumors cannot be classified as malignant on the basis of their location and size alone, and that histological evaluation described in the other two criteria (ii) and (iii) should be of value. None of the five hepatic glomus tumor cases reported thus far have displayed histological abnormalities [ 7 12 ]; this is the first case arising in the liver with histological atypical features. In the atypical-looking lesion, mitotic figures were frequently seen (35/50 HPFs), but nuclear atypia was not higher than a typical malignant glomus tumor [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Seventy-five percent are subungual, however, these may pose a difficult diagnosing these tumors[3]. Although frequently found in the dermis, glomus tumors may occur in deep soft tissue or visceral sites throughout the body including lung, gastrointestinal, and liver[4,5]. Hypertrophy of a glomus body, an innervated, coiled, arteriovenous dermal shunt that normally controls skin temperature, is evident this tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%