2018
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glocalizing Inclusive Quality Education in Hong Kong: From Pedagogical Challenges to Research Opportunities

Abstract: Since the launch of the Whole School Approach to Integrated Education (WSA) in 1997, mainstream schools in Hong Kong have been admitting an increasing diversity of learners. They include, for example, children identified with different categorical learning needs, and more recently those who learn Chinese as a second language. Nonetheless, many teachers in this predominantly Chinese community remain skeptical to date about their pedagogical capacity for achieving greater inclusion. This paper discusses the cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, studies show that even among the signatories of the convention there are still great differences concerning the implementation of Article 24. Most studies that examine different approaches to implementing inclusive education focus on single countries or conduct crossnational, comparative studies (e.g., Ainscow et al, 2006;Powell et al, 2016;Li, 2018). These studies suggest, among others, differences in the role of government or in the various national traditions around the schooling of persons with disabilities, which in turn result in differences in the national discourse about the issue.…”
Section: Theoretical Background Inclusive Education and Innovation DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies show that even among the signatories of the convention there are still great differences concerning the implementation of Article 24. Most studies that examine different approaches to implementing inclusive education focus on single countries or conduct crossnational, comparative studies (e.g., Ainscow et al, 2006;Powell et al, 2016;Li, 2018). These studies suggest, among others, differences in the role of government or in the various national traditions around the schooling of persons with disabilities, which in turn result in differences in the national discourse about the issue.…”
Section: Theoretical Background Inclusive Education and Innovation DImentioning
confidence: 99%