2014
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globular clusters of NGC 3115 in the near-infrared

Abstract: We combined new near-infrared VLT/HAWK-I data of the globular clusters (GCs) in the isolated edge-on S0 galaxy NGC 3115 with optical and spectroscopic ones taken from the literature, with the aim of analyzing the multiband GC color distributions. A recent study from the SLUGGS survey has shown that the GCs in this galaxy follow a bimodal distribution of Ca II triplet indices. Thus, NGC 3115 presents a critical example of a GC system with multiple, distinct, metallicity subpopulations, and this may argue agains… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(43 reference statements)
2
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The GCs of NGC3115 show a clear separation between metal-poor and rich GCs, yet GCs still lie along with our models. As suggested by Cantiello et al (2014), several metal-rich GCs in NGC3115 prefer the younger-age model (cyan lines), which explains the presence of a group of metal-rich GCs with small offsets from models. In the same vein, the metal-rich GCs in NGC4494 can be also explained by younger-age stellar populations (Foster et al 2011).…”
Section: Comparison With Observationsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The GCs of NGC3115 show a clear separation between metal-poor and rich GCs, yet GCs still lie along with our models. As suggested by Cantiello et al (2014), several metal-rich GCs in NGC3115 prefer the younger-age model (cyan lines), which explains the presence of a group of metal-rich GCs with small offsets from models. In the same vein, the metal-rich GCs in NGC4494 can be also explained by younger-age stellar populations (Foster et al 2011).…”
Section: Comparison With Observationsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Because of its proximity, the galaxy and its satellites were targeted by many photometric and spectroscopic studies (Hanes & Harris 1986;Capaccioli et al 1987;Kundu & Whitmore 1998;Puzia et al 2000Puzia et al , 2002Norris et al 2006;Arnold et al 2011;Usher et al 2012). Moreover, we recall that the GC system of the galaxy is the first system beyond the Local Group with a confirmed bimodal metallicity distribution, as shown by Brodie et al (2012) from calcium triplet analysis and by Cantiello et al (2014) using optical to near-IR photometry (see also Blakeslee et al 2010;Yoon et al 2011). The paper is organized as follows: the next section briefly describes the observations and data reduction procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In many galaxies, a long-standing empirical feature of the MDF is its bimodal nature, with a canonical metal-poor (MP) "blue" sequence centered near [ ]  á ñ -Fe H 1.5 and a metal-rich (MR) "red" sequence near [ ]  á ñ -Fe H 0.5. Many authors have adopted the view that this two-part structure of the MDF is evidence of two major and perhaps distinct starforming epochs in the formation histories of large galaxies, a view that has persisted for many years (e.g., Zepf & Ashman 1993;Forbes et al 1997Forbes et al , 2011Arnold et al 2011;Blom et al 2012b;Brodie et al 2014;Cantiello et al 2014;Kartha et al 2016, among many others). However, bimodal MDFs are not characteristic of the field-halo stars in their parent galaxies, in the few cases where it has been possible to directly compare the GCs and halo stars in the same galaxy (e.g., Harris et al 2007;Durrell et al 2010;Rejkuba et al 2011Rejkuba et al , 2014Monachesi et al 2016).…”
Section: Metallicity and Color Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extensive literature that reveals clearly bimodal CDFs for many galaxies therefore continues to be important (e.g., Geisler et al 1996;Neilsen & Tsvetanov 1999;Kundu & Whitmore 2001;Larsen et al 2001;Rhode & Zepf 2004;Bassino et al 2006;Peng et al 2006;Harris 2009aHarris , 2009bFaifer et al 2011;Cantiello et al 2014;Jennings et al 2014;Kartha et al 2014, among many others). At the same time, some galaxies are better described as trimodal, unimodal, or simply broad without matching a simple Gaussian-type model (for specific examples, see Larsen et al 2001Larsen et al , 2005Peng et al 2006;Kundu & Zepf 2007;Blom et al 2012b;Usher et al 2012).…”
Section: Metallicity and Color Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%