2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2017) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2017.7950525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globally optimal breast mass segmentation from DCE-MRI using deep semantic segmentation as shape prior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite a suboptimal training dataset, which was limited in size and contained some heterogeneity of MRI parameters, the U‐net achieved comparable Dice coefficient performance to recently published methods . This segmentation accuracy is achieved in a realistic, clinically challenging dataset which comprises several breast cancer subtypes and presentations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite a suboptimal training dataset, which was limited in size and contained some heterogeneity of MRI parameters, the U‐net achieved comparable Dice coefficient performance to recently published methods . This segmentation accuracy is achieved in a realistic, clinically challenging dataset which comprises several breast cancer subtypes and presentations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Despite a suboptimal training dataset, which was limited in size and contained some heterogeneity of MRI parameters, the U-net achieved comparable Dice coefficient performance to recently published methods. 9,20 This segmentation accuracy is achieved in a realistic, clinically challenging dataset which comprises several breast cancer subtypes and presentations. A consequence of the limited dataset size is the fact that the CNN, when trained using data from either R1 or R3, generally overfit the training data, yielding a higher Dice coefficient across the training dataset than the testing set in both instances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another limitation of this work involves the lack of cross-validation experiments. This decision is justified to allow a fair comparison with other works (Maicas et al, 2017a(Maicas et al, ,b, 2018aMcClymont et al, 2014) on the same dataset. Future work involves the improvement of the malignant lesion localization in post-hoc methodologies by designing a new method specifically for the small training set available.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea behind their contribution is to model the underlying dynamics of the tumor by a linear dynamics system and use the system parameters to segment the cancer. Maicas et al [27] have proposed a method based on a globally optimal inference in a continuous space using a shape prior computed from a semantic segmentation produced by a deep learning model. Despite the fact that the presented state-of-the-art methods are based on strong theoretical foundations, they actually generate a large amount of computations per final output.…”
Section: Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, extraction of breast tumor from MR images is a challenging task due to their considerable shape variations, intensity inhomogeneity, overlap with the normal breast tissue, etc. Several segmentation methods are proposed in the literature to address these issues including contour-based [11][12][13][14] and region-based [15][16][17][22][23][24][25][26][27] approaches. Unfortunately, none of the state-of-the-art methods produced rigorous results and the challenge remains open.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%