2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-018-0750-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globally Divergence-Free Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Ideal Magnetohydrodynamic Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11,24,8,46,34]. In the past several decades, many numerical techniques were proposed to control the divergence error or enforce the divergence-free condition in the discrete sense, including but not limited to: the projection method [11], the locally divergence-free methods [34,60], the hyperbolic divergence cleaning method [20], the constrained transport method [24] and its variants (e.g., [43,8,3,27,45,1,35,17,25]), and the eight-wave methods (e.g., [40,41,12,38]). The eight-wave method was first proposed by Powell [40,41], based on appropriate discretization of the modified MHD equations of Godunov [28]: U t + ∇ · F(U) = −(∇ · B) S(U), (1.4) where S(U) = (0, B, v, v · B) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11,24,8,46,34]. In the past several decades, many numerical techniques were proposed to control the divergence error or enforce the divergence-free condition in the discrete sense, including but not limited to: the projection method [11], the locally divergence-free methods [34,60], the hyperbolic divergence cleaning method [20], the constrained transport method [24] and its variants (e.g., [43,8,3,27,45,1,35,17,25]), and the eight-wave methods (e.g., [40,41,12,38]). The eight-wave method was first proposed by Powell [40,41], based on appropriate discretization of the modified MHD equations of Godunov [28]: U t + ∇ · F(U) = −(∇ · B) S(U), (1.4) where S(U) = (0, B, v, v · B) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to the discussion in [18] for a comparison of various version of CT methods. See also the recent work on global divergence-free DG methods for compressible MHD [8,13], which can be interpreted as high-order CT-type methods. The key idea to achieve a divergence-free magnetic field for the CT methods is to first advance in time the normal component of the magnetic field on the mesh interfaces, then apply a (locally defined) divergencefree reconstruction procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key step there is to design a special local divergence-free test function space for the magnetic field which can make the divergence-free condition automatically hold in each cell. This strategy has been further explored in the past years and many local and global divergence-free DG methods have been proposed, see [27,28,8,45,36,19]. However, all the above mentioned works are on Cartesian meshes and for 2D MHD computation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%